Article 21a And The Right To Education - Evaluating Implementation And Gaps

Author: LawSphereX

Category: Constitutional & Human Rights

Published: 2026-08-23T18:10:13.412308+00:00

Updated: 2026-08-26T17:12:06.599+00:00

ARTICLE 21A AND THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION:

EVALUATING IMPLEMENTATION AND GAPS

Shatakshi, B.A.LL.B., KIIT School of Law, Bhubaneswar, Odisha

ABSTRACT

The insertion of Article 21A into the Constitution of India through the 86th Amendment Act of 2002 marked a significant milestone in recognizing education as a fundamental right. It mandates free and compulsory education for all children between the ages of 6 and 14. Operationalized through the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009, this provision was envisioned to be a transformative step toward universal elementary education. However, more than a decade since its implementation, significant gaps persist between constitutional promises and ground realities. This research paper critically evaluates the implementation of Article 21A by examining various indicators such as enrolment and retention rates, infrastructure development, quality of education, and learning outcomes.

It analyses the roles played by central and state governments, as well as the functioning of School Management Committees and the impact of policies like Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan. The paper also explores how socio-economic disparities, gender, caste, and regional inequalities continue to undermine the goal of equitable education. Special attention is given to challenges faced in the implementation of Section 12(1)(c) of the RTE Act, which mandates a 25% reservation in private schools for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. Furthermore, the paper assesses the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to education, especially the widening digital divide. Judicial pronouncements and policy critiques are incorporated to provide a holistic view of the progress and limitations of Article 21A.

The study concludes with recommendations aimed at bridging policy-practice gaps, enhancing accountability, and strengthening the educational framework to fulfil the constitutional mandate of universal elementary education. Keywords: Article 21A, Right to Education, RTE Act 2009, Educational Inequality, Implementation Gaps

INTRODUCTION

Education is universally recognized as a foundational pillar for the development of individuals and societies. In democratic nations, it plays a crucial role in empowering citizens, promoting equality, and fostering economic and social progress. In India, this recognition culminated in a landmark constitutional development with the insertion of Article 21A by the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002, which made the Right to Education a fundamental right for all children aged 6 to 14 years. This right was further operationalized through the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (commonly known as the RTE Act), which came into effect on April 1, 2010.

Article 21A marked a shift from a directive principle (Article 45) to an enforceable right under Part III of the Constitution, thereby giving education the same status as other fundamental rights such as the right to life and personal liberty. This legal development was preceded by judicial activism, especially through cases like Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka (1992) and Unnikrishnan J. P. v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993), which interpreted the right to education as an implicit part of Article 21. The constitutional mandate under Article 21A symbolizes India’s commitment to universalizing elementary education and eliminating disparities caused by poverty, caste, gender, and geography. However, the practical realization of this right has been far from complete. Despite more than a decade of implementation, significant gaps exist between policy and practice.

While India has achieved near-universal enrolment at the primary level, challenges persist in terms of dropout rates, poor learning outcomes, teacher shortages, inadequate infrastructure, and inequitable access, especially for marginalized communities such as SCs, STs, girls, and children with disabilities. The COVID-19 pandemic further deepened these gaps by disrupting conventional schooling and exposing the digital divide, where millions of children lacked access to online learning tools. Furthermore, the provision under Section 12(1)(c) of the RTE Act, which mandates 25% reservation in private unaided schools for economically weaker sections and disadvantaged groups, has faced several implementation challenges, including non-compliance, lack of awareness, and administrative hurdles.

This research paper aims to critically evaluate the implementation of Article 21A, focusing on both achievements and persistent challenges. It seeks to examine the institutional mechanisms, fiscal policies, judicial interventions, and ground-level realities that influence the delivery of education. The study also highlights regional and social disparities, and explores whether the legal guarantee under Article 21A has translated into substantive educational equity and quality. By drawing upon data, case law, policy reviews, and field-level reports, the paper will analyse the extent to which Article 21A has fulfilled its transformative potential. The objective is not only to assess the implementation status but also to identify systemic gaps and offer concrete policy recommendations to bridge them.

In doing so, the research hopes to contribute meaningfully to the broader discourse on the right to education as a tool for inclusive and equitable development in India.

1. CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK

Overview of Article 21A Article 21A of the Indian Constitution, inserted by the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002, establishes that: “The State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years in such manner as the State may, by law, determine. ” This provision makes elementary education (Classes I to VIII) a Fundamental Right, shifting it from the list of Directive Principles of State Policy (Article 45) to a justiciable right under Part III of the Constitution. The amendment arose from the need to legally enforce the right to education as a critical component of the right to life and dignity under Article 21, as interpreted in judicial decisions in the 1990s.

Article 21A is not just a symbolic commitment—it legally obligates the state to ensure free (no financial burden on the child or parent) and compulsory (state's duty to ensure enrolment, attendance, and completion) education for all children within the specified age group.

1.2 Salient Features of the Right to Education Act, 2009

The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009 operationalizes

Article 21A. Key features include:

1. Free and Compulsory Education: Every child between 6–14 years has the right to

elementary education free of cost in a neighbourhood school.

2. Minimum Infrastructure Norms: Schools must meet specified standards regarding

classrooms, toilets, drinking water, teachers, etc.

3. No Detention Policy: No child shall be held back or expelled until the completion of

elementary education (though later amendments allowed states to modify this).

4. Teacher-Related Provisions: Recruitment of professionally qualified teachers, defined

pupil-teacher ratios, and regular training.

5. Prohibition of Screening and Capitation Fees: Admission cannot be based on

tests/interviews or any form of donation.

6. 25% Reservation in Private Schools: Under Section 12(1)(c), unaided private schools

must reserve at least 25% of entry-level seats for children from economically weaker sections and disadvantaged groups.

7. Special Provisions for Disadvantaged Children: Focus on inclusion of SC/ST children,

children with disabilities, migrant children, and working children.

8. School Management Committees (SMCs): To ensure community participation in school

governance.

1.3 Relationship between Article 21A and Other Constitutional Provisions

1. Article 14 – Right to Equality

Article 21A complements Article 14 by ensuring equal educational opportunities to all children, regardless of socio-economic background. Education acts as a tool to reduce social inequality and promote equal status and opportunity.

2. Article 15 – Prohibition of Discrimination

Article 15(3) permits the state to make special provisions for children. The RTE Act uses this to justify affirmative measures like 25% reservation in private schools to support disadvantaged children.

3. Article 45 – Directive Principle of State Policy

Originally, Article 45 (in Part IV) stated that the state should provide free and compulsory education to children up to age 14. With Article 21A’s insertion, this goal moved into the realm of enforceable rights. Article 45 was later revised to promote early childhood care and education for children below six years.

4. Article 19(1)(g) – Freedom to Practice Any Profession

The 25% reservation in private schools led to legal debates about its compatibility with Article 19(1)(g), which guarantees the right to practice any profession. However, in Society for Unaided Private Schools of Rajasthan v. Union of India (2012), the Supreme Court upheld the RTE Act's constitutionality, stating that private institutions must comply with Article 21A's social objective.

5. Article 51A(k) – Fundamental Duties

Added through the 86th Amendment, this article makes it the duty of parents/guardians to provide education to their children aged 6–14, complementing the state's obligation under Article 21A. Together, Article 21A and the RTE Act create a robust legal framework aimed at achieving universal, inclusive, and equitable elementary education in India. However, implementation challenges and systemic gaps continue to hinder its full realization, which this research aims to explore in depth.

2. INSTITITUTIONAL MECHANISMS FOR IMPLEMENTATION

The implementation of Article 21A and the Right to Education Act, 2009 relies on a multitiered institutional structure, involving central, state, and local authorities. Each level plays a distinct and coordinated role in ensuring delivery and accountability in elementary education.

2.1 Role of Central and State Governments

Central Government: o Formulates national-level policies and schemes such as Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) and Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan. o Provides financial support to states, usually on a shared basis (e.g., 60:40 between Centre and states). o Sets norms for curriculum (via NCERT) and maintains standards through bodies like NCTE (for teacher education). o Monitors progress through institutions like National Achievement Survey (NAS) conducted by NCERT. • State Governments: o Primary implementers of the RTE Act through State Education Departments. o Responsible for running government schools, recruiting teachers, providing infrastructure, and ensuring compliance with RTE norms. o Prepare State Rules under the RTE Act, adapting national policies to local contexts.

2.2 Role of Local Bodies and School Management Committees (SMCs)

Local Authorities (Panchayati Raj Institutions and Urban Local Bodies): o Entrusted under the RTE Act with managing and maintaining local schools. o Monitor school functioning and mobilize community participation. • School Management Committees (SMCs): o Mandated under Section 21 of the RTE Act.

o Comprise parents, local officials, and teachers, with at least 50% women representation. o Prepare and monitor the School Development Plan (SDP), oversee use of grants, and ensure regular attendance. o Strengthen grassroots accountability and local governance of education.

2.3 Monitoring and Grievance Redressal Systems

National and State Commissions for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR/SCPCRs): o Designated to monitor the RTE Act’s implementation. o Receive and resolve complaints related to denial of education or violation of child rights in school settings. • RTE Entitlements Portal and helplines in some states allow parents to file complaints. • However, lack of awareness, bureaucratic delays, and inadequate staffing often weaken grievance redressal effectiveness.

3. EVALUATION FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Despite the legal and institutional frameworks, the actual implementation of Article 21A varies widely across states and districts.

3.1 Enrolment and Retention Rates (National and State-wise Analysis)

Enrolment: India has achieved near-universal enrolment at the primary level (>95%). o Example: According to UDISE+ (2021–22), the Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) for primary education is around 104.8%. • Retention: Dropout rates increase at upper primary and secondary levels. o States like Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu show high retention,

while states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and Jharkhand lag behind. o Girls and children from SC/ST backgrounds face higher dropout rates, often due to socio-economic factors and lack of support structures.

3.2 Infrastructure and Resource Availability in Government Schools

While the RTE Act mandates basic infrastructure (classrooms, toilets, drinking water, boundary walls), implementation is uneven. o According to UDISE+: § About 94% of schools have drinking water. § 78% have functional girls’ toilets. § But only 40–50% meet all RTE-prescribed norms. • Issues: o Poor maintenance, multi-grade classrooms, and lack of digital infrastructure. o Urban-rural disparity and budget constraints affect infrastructure development.

3.3 Quality of Education and Learning Outcomes

The focus on enrolment has often overshadowed learning outcomes. o Reports like ASER (Annual Status of Education Report) consistently show that many children in Grade 5 cannot read Grade 2-level text or solve basic arithmetic problems. o Government schools often lag behind private schools in performance. • Contributing factors: o Overburdened teachers, large class sizes, lack of remedial support, and poor pedagogy.

3.4 Status of Teacher Recruitment and Training

Teacher Shortage: Over 10 lakh teaching posts remain vacant nationwide, especially in rural and remote areas. • Training and Qualifications: o The RTE Act mandates that all teachers be professionally trained, but many still lack proper certification. o Continuous Professional Development (CPD) is weak in most states. • Pupil-Teacher Ratio (PTR): o The RTE norm is 30:1 at the primary level. Many schools meet this, but disparities persist in tribal and underdeveloped districts.

4. SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND REGIONAL DISPARITIES IN EDUCATION IN INDIA

4.1 Urban vs. Rural Education Systems

Infrastructure Gap o Urban schools generally have better buildings, electricity, clean toilets (especially for girls), playgrounds, libraries, and internet access. o Rural schools often face inadequate infrastructure, multi-grade classrooms, lack of toilets (especially girls’ toilets), and limited access to learning materials. • Teacher Availability and Quality o Urban areas attract more qualified and trained teachers due to better living conditions and salaries. o Rural schools often suffer from teacher shortages, untrained staff, and high rates of teacher absenteeism.

Learning Outcomes o Urban students typically perform better in reading, writing, and arithmetic, as seen in ASER (Annual Status of Education Report) surveys. o Rural children often fall behind due to poor foundational teaching and less home support. • Access to Schools o Urban areas have more schools within close proximity. o In remote rural and tribal areas, children often walk long distances or drop out due to inaccessibility.

4.2 Caste, Class, and Gender-Based Gaps

Caste-Based Inequalities o Historically marginalized castes like Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) face discrimination in schools. o Issues include: o Seating arrangements that isolate lower-caste children. o Fewer role models from their communities in teaching roles. o Higher dropout rates, especially in higher classes. • Class and Economic Disparities o Children from poor families face multiple challenges: o Inability to afford books, uniforms, transport, or tuition. o Pressure to engage in child labour to support family income.

o Economic disadvantage leads to lower enrolment and learning levels. • Gender-Based Gaps o Girls face multiple hurdles: o Cultural biases favouring boys' education. o Early marriage or household responsibilities. o Safety concerns and lack of separate toilets. o Dropout rates among girls, especially from SC/ST backgrounds, are higher at secondary level.

4.3 Education of Marginalized Communities

Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) o Higher levels of poverty, illiteracy, and social exclusion. o Language barriers for tribal children not fluent in the medium of instruction. o Government schemes like scholarships and residential schools help but are not universally effective. • Other Backward Classes (OBC) o Though better off than SC/ST groups in some regions, many still face educational backwardness due to poverty and lack of representation in quality institutions. o Caste-based bias and competition for resources may affect their access to government schemes. • Religious Minorities (e.g., Muslims, Christians, Sikhs) o Muslims, in particular, have some of the lowest literacy and enrolment rates,

especially for girls. o Limited access to government schools in Muslim-majority areas. o Stereotyping and bias sometimes discourage full participation. • Children with Disabilities o Major gaps in inclusion: o Physical infrastructure often not accessible (e.g., ramps, lifts). o Teachers are not trained in inclusive education or special needs. o High dropout rates due to lack of emotional and educational support. o Though the RTE Act mandates inclusion, implementation is weak.

5. JUDICIAL AND POLICY PERSPECTIVES ON ARTICLE 21A

5.1 Important Judgments Interpreting Article 21A

(a) Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka (1992) • Issue: Whether the right to education is part of the right to life under Article 21. • Judgment: Supreme Court held that right to education is a fundamental right implicit in the right to life. • Significance: First case to strongly link education with human dignity and equality. (b) Unnikrishnan J.P. v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993) • Issue: Whether private educational institutions can charge capitation fees. • Judgment: o Reaffirmed that the right to education up to age 14 is a fundamental right under Article 21.

o Education beyond 14 years is not a fundamental right, but the State has a duty to provide it. • Impact: Influenced the 86th Constitutional Amendment, which added Article 21A. (c) Society for Unaided Private Schools of Rajasthan v. Union of India (2012) • Issue: Challenge to the constitutional validity of 25% reservation for economically weaker sections in private unaided schools under Section 12(1)(c) of the RTE Act. • Judgment: o Supreme Court upheld the RTE Act as constitutional. o Stated that private schools must share the burden of social responsibility to ensure universal education. • Exception: Minority-run unaided institutions were exempted to protect their rights under Article 30(1).

5.2 Critique of the RTE Act from a Policy Perspective

Strengths o Recognized free and compulsory education as a justiciable right for children aged 6–14. o Introduced standards for school infrastructure, teacher qualifications, and pupilteacher ratios. o Promoted inclusive education through 25% EWS reservation in private unaided schools. • Criticisms o Limited Age Coverage: Does not include early childhood (0–6 years) or secondary education (14–18 years).

o Quality vs Access: Emphasized enrolment and infrastructure, but learning outcomes remain poor. o Weak Enforcement: No clear penalty or accountability mechanisms for violations. o Implementation Gaps: o Many states fail to ensure 25% EWS admissions. o Poor reimbursement to private schools. o Lack of monitoring and data transparency. • Exclusion of Minority Institutions o Minority-run schools are exempt from RTE obligations, which undermines the goal of universal education access.

5.3 Comparison with International Frameworks

(a) Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 – UN 2030 Agenda • Goal: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning for all. • Targets: o Universal primary and secondary education. o Equal access to affordable technical, vocational, and higher education. o Elimination of gender disparities. • India’s Progress: o Improvements in enrolment and infrastructure. o Still lags in quality, equity, and learning outcomes.

(b) UNESCO’s Right to Education Norms • Principles: o Availability: Free and compulsory education must be provided. o Accessibility: Education should be non-discriminatory and physically/economically accessible. o Acceptability: Quality education, relevant curriculum, and trained teachers. o Adaptability: Education must adjust to the needs of different communities and learners. • Gap in India: o Strong on availability, but weak on acceptability (quality) and adaptability (inclusive curriculum, pedagogy).

6. POST-COVID CHALLENGES AND THE DIGITAL DIVIDE

6.1 Impact of School Closures on Learning Continuity

Disruption in Education o Nationwide school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted learning for over 250 million children in India. o The longest closures were seen in government schools, affecting the most vulnerable children. • Learning Loss o Studies (e.g., ASER 2021, World Bank reports) showed: o Decline in basic literacy and numeracy skills. o Children forgot previously learned material due to lack of regular

teaching. o Students from rural and disadvantaged backgrounds were disproportionately affected. • Increased Dropouts o Many children, especially girls and those from poor families, did not return to school after reopening due to: o Financial stress. o Early marriage or child labour. o Lack of support to re-enrol.

6.2 Access to Digital Infrastructure for Remote Learning

Digital Divide o Shift to online learning highlighted deep inequalities in digital access. o According to the NSO (2020) and ASER reports: o Only 15% of rural households had access to internet. o Only 1 in 4 school-going children had access to a smartphone for learning. o Gender disparity: Girls had less access to devices compared to boys. • Challenges in Remote Learning o Lack of digital literacy among students and parents. o Many children were unable to follow online classes due to: o Shared devices.

o Poor internet connectivity. o No electricity or stable learning environment at home. o Teachers also lacked training in online pedagogy and digital tools.

6.3 Policy Response and Gaps

Government Initiatives o PM e-Vidya: A multi-mode access platform with TV channels, radio, and online content. o DIKSHA portal: A digital platform offering e-content and teacher training. o Community-based learning: In some states, teachers conducted home visits and local classes. • Limitations and Gaps o Unequal reach: Digital and TV-based initiatives couldn’t reach many tribal and rural areas. o Lack of Monitoring: No proper tracking of student participation or learning outcomes. o One-size-fits-all approach: Content wasn’t adapted for local languages, disabled children, or diverse needs. o Mental health ignored: No major initiatives to address student well-being and emotional stress during the pandemic.

7. RECOMMENDATIONS AND THE WAY FORWARD

7.1 Bridging Access and Quality Gaps

• Expand Age Coverage

Extend Article 21A to include: o Early Childhood Education (0–6 years) – foundational learning is critical before Class 1. o Secondary Education (14–18 years) – essential for employability and empowerment. • Improve School Infrastructure o Ensure electricity, water, separate toilets for girls, libraries, internet across all schools, especially rural and tribal areas. o Implement school safety norms and disaster preparedness plans (post-COVID learning). • Focus on Learning Outcomes o Shift from enrolment targets to real learning goals. o Use regular assessments (like NAS, ASER) to guide policy. o Promote activity-based, multilingual, and inclusive pedagogies. • Teacher Training and Support o Invest in continuous professional development for teachers. o Ensure proper pupil-teacher ratio, especially in remote areas. o Use technology for teacher mentoring and monitoring.

7.2 Strengthening Institutional Accountability

Effective Monitoring and Data Use o Build real-time data systems to track:

o Attendance, infrastructure, learning outcomes, and spending. o Empower School Management Committees (SMCs) to monitor local school functioning. • Decentralized and Participatory Governance o Strengthen community participation in school planning. o Promote transparency in budgets and schemes like mid-day meals, teacher appointments, and RTE admissions. • Audit and Grievance Redressal o Establish independent audit bodies to review school funds and implementation of the RTE Act. o Create functional grievance redressal mechanisms at the district and block level.

7.3 Suggestions for Legal and Policy Reforms

Amend the RTE Act o Include: o Children below 6 and above 14 years in the ambit of Article 21A. o Children with disabilities with special focus and specific rights. o Make quality benchmarks and learning outcomes legally enforceable, not just infrastructure norms. • Strengthen Financial Commitments o Allocate at least 6% of GDP to education (as recommended by NEP 2020 and Kothari Commission). o Ensure timely fund release and reduction of leakages in schemes like Samagra

Shiksha. • Regulate Private Sector o Enforce fee regulations and transparency in private schools. o Ensure full implementation of Section 12(1)(c) (25% EWS quota), with robust verification and accountability mechanisms. o Develop public-private partnership models without compromising equity. • Inclusive and Digital Education Policies o Adopt universal digital access as a policy goal. o Promote inclusive digital content for all – including tribal, disabled, and minority children. o Integrate mental health and well-being support in school curricula.

8. CONCLUSION

The recognition of education as a fundamental right under Article 21A of the Indian Constitution marked a historic step toward building an equitable and just society. Since the enactment of the Right to Education (RTE) Act in 2009, India has made progress in expanding access to education, improving enrolment rates, and increasing awareness of children’s educational rights. Landmark judgments such as Mohini Jain, Unnikrishnan, and Society for Unaided Private Schools of Rajasthan have reinforced the legal and moral imperative of providing free and compulsory education to all children aged 6 to 14 years. However, despite these advancements, significant gaps remain in implementation and outcomes. Deep socio-economic, caste, gender, and regional disparities continue to affect access to quality education.

Children from marginalized communities—such as SCs, STs, OBCs, religious minorities, and those with disabilities—often face systemic exclusion. The digital divide, particularly exposed during the COVID-19 pandemic, has further widened educational inequalities, highlighting the urgent need for inclusive digital infrastructure and teacher support. Moreover, budgetary constraints, underfunding, poor monitoring, and

weak institutional accountability have hindered the full realization of Article 21A. The private sector’s role, especially regarding the 25% EWS reservation in unaided schools, remains contested and inconsistently implemented. While India has made some progress, it continues to lag behind international standards such as SDG 4 and UNESCO’s right to education norms, which emphasize not just access, but also equity, quality, and lifelong learning. To move forward, India must expand the scope of Article 21A to include early childhood and secondary education, ensure robust enforcement of the RTE Act, and strengthen public investment in education. Legal reforms must be accompanied by policy actions that focus on outcomes, inclusion, and accountability. In essence, education is not only a constitutional obligation but a foundational human right.

Realizing the true spirit of Article 21A means ensuring that every child, regardless of background, has access to meaningful, quality, and inclusive education—thereby building the foundation for a more just, equal, and empowered society.

REFERENCES

1. Government of India. (2009). The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education

Act, 2009. Ministry of Law and Justice. https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A2009-35.pdf

2. Constitution

of India. (1950). Article 21A.

Government of India. https://legislative.gov.in/constitution-of-india

3. Supreme Court of India. (1992). Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka, AIR 1992 SC 1858.

4. Supreme Court of India. (1993). Unnikrishnan J.P. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR

1993 SC 2178.

5. Supreme Court of India. (2012). Society for Unaided Private Schools of Rajasthan v.

Union of India, (2012) 6 SCC 1.

6. Ministry of Education. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Government of India.

https://www.education.gov.in/en/nep-2020

7. National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT). (2021). Learning

Outcomes at the Elementary Stage.

8. Pratham. (2021). Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2021 – Rural.

http://www.asercentre.org

9. UNESCO. (2020). Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and education

– All means all. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373718

10. UNICEF. (2021). COVID-19 and School Closures: One year of education disruption.

https://www.unicef.org/reports/one-year-education-disruption

11. World Bank. (2020). Simulating the Potential Impacts of COVID-19 School Closures

on Schooling and Learning Outcomes:

A

set of global estimates. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail

12. NITI

Aayog. (2021). School Education Quality Index (SEQI).

https://www.niti.gov.in

13. Jha, P., & Parvati, P. (2010). Right to Education Act 2009: Critical gaps and challenges.

Economic and Political Weekly, 45(13), 20–23.

14. Ramachandran, V. (2015). Equity and Quality in Education: A review of policies and

practices in India. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.11.005

15. Kumar, K. (2006). Political agenda of education: A study of colonialist and nationalist

ideas. SAGE Publications.

16. De, A., & Dreze, J. (1999). Public report on basic education in India. Oxford University

Press.

17. United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable

Development

(SDG

4). https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4

18. UNESCO.

(2007). Right to Education: Normative Framework. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000152986