Legal Aid - A Modern-Day Exception
Author: LawSphereX
Category: General Law
Published:
Updated:
LEGAL AID: A MODERN-DAY EXCEPTION?
Sonam Singh, Research Scholar, Galgotias University, School of Law
ABSTRACT
The present paper evaluates the position of legal aid services in India. With the introduction of free legal services to the citizens, the regime of legal aid has grown over time. Presently, it is considered a fundamental right of the citizens. However, there are certain modern-day problems attached to these services which are blocking the rightful applicability of laws. The researcher has highlighted the broad overview of the concept with numerous problems attached to free legal aid in India. The present concept is governed under the legal service Act, 1987 wherein the eligibility, types of services, etc are elaborated. The researcher also analyzed whether the purpose of the act which is “justice for all” is precisely served or not. The research also includes comprehensive suggestions and revamps required to make the free legal aid service system more reliable and operative.
Keywords: Legal Aid, LACs, NALSA, DLSA, Lok Adalat, Justice, wealth
INTRODUCTION
Legal aid has been one of the most significant developments in modern atrocities. It aims to curb the legal problems of citizens and help in providing justice. Free Legal aid services are closely tied to social welfare, and state legal assistance is impacted by welfare ideas. Legal assistance is a state benefit for those who cannot afford legal assistance. Legal aid ensures that those eligible for welfare benefits, such as housing benefits, have access to legal counsel and the courts. Legal Aid is a system designed to ensure that no one is denied competent guidance and assistance due to insufficient funding. Therefore, the primary purpose is to provide equitable justice that is accessible to the poor, disadvantaged, and weaker members of society.
It has historically figured prominently in guaranteeing respect for economic, interpersonal, and cultural rights related to social safety, housing, social care, health, and instructional service provision, whether provided privately or publicly, as well as terms and conditions of employment and anti-discrimination legislation1. The disadvantaged groups continue to be uninformed and opaque to the professional legal system because of many issues such as illiteracy, destitution, a lack of understanding of their rights, and corruption. As a result, they continue to experience the substantive disparities that afflict their lives. The Indian Constitution establishes a legal framework that safeguards the rights of all citizens of the country. In the Preamble, the Constitution has both defined and expressed the shared objective for its inhabitants.
Concerning the situation, article 39A2 of the Constitution states that the state shall ensure that the function of a legal system encourages justice based on reciprocity and shall, in particular, facilitate free legal aid through suitable legislation or schemes or in any other way to ensure that no citizen with economic or other disabilities is denied the opportunity to obtain justice. In order to realize the aim of justice for everyone, the government provides free legal help to those in need. Legal aid is the provision of free legal services to the poor and disadvantaged who cannot afford the services of a lawyer for the conduct of a case or legal action before a court, tribunal, or administrative agency. However, in a nation with a population of more than a billion, it becomes extremely challenging to give free legal assistance to everyone.
In Sheela Barse Case3, it was concluded that providing legal support to a poor alleged offender who has been arrested and whose life or personal liberty is in peril is a fundamental requirement that is demanded not only by article 39-A of the constitution but also by articles 21 and 14 of the constitution. Legal Aid is a movement that promotes the idea that low-income people should have straightforward access to the judicial system as well as other branches of the government and their respective authorities. The provision of "access to justice for everyone" is the goal of legal aid programs, intending to prevent citizens from being denied justice due to a lack of financial means or other impediments4. About seventy percent of rural residents are illiterate and are unaware of the legal rights granted to them. Even literate individuals are unaware of their legal rights and privileges.
The lack of legal understanding is to blame for the deceit, exploitation, and denial of rights and benefits to the poor and disadvantaged. Due to their lack of knowledge, they are unable of predicting legal issues and contacting a lawyer in a timely manner, therefore their legal requirements are always likely to be crisis-driven. Due to a lack of legal understanding, individuals are unable to access legal service programs for securing their rights and putting a stop to their exploitation, rendering them completely defenseless. As per section 12(h)5 “citizens with less than the income prescribed by the State government and if the case is before any court except Apex court & less than 5 Lakhs annually can register their case under free legal aid”.
Services rendered in connection with the conduct of any lawsuit or other legal process before any court or other authority or tribunal, including advice on any legal topic, are all considered "legal services" under Section 2(c)6 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. Free legal services could consist of7: a) Having an Advocate represent you in court. b) Paper book preparation, including printing and translation of documents in legal processes; c) Preparation of pleadings, the note of appeal, paper book; d) Drafting of legal papers, special leave petitions, etc. e) Court papers such as orders, judgments, and evidence memos can be sent in certified copy form. In addition to ensuring that everyone has access to justice in any way they see fit, free legal services also involve helping people qualify for and receive benefits under federal and state welfare laws and programs.
Legal assistance is widely viewed as an essential component in preserving equality before the law, the right to counsel, and the right to a trial that is conducted in accordance with established standards. The researcher tries to highlight the problems relating to the delivery of these services and suggest favorable solutions in order to make the legal system more effective and contribute to a better judicial system.
RESEARCH
OBJECTIVES
1. To understand the laws on legal aid services in India.
2. To scrutinize the working of the legal aid system provided by LAC.
3. To check the efficiency of laws relating to legal aid.
4. To observe the effectiveness of the application of such laws at all levels and part of the
country.
5. To highlight the problems associated with rendering such services in India.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
1. What are the problems associated with rendering legal aid services in India?
2. Whether the states are complying with the laws of free legal aid?
3. Whether due to the low competency of administration, adversely impacted the quality
of services provided to citizens?
4. What are relevant suggestions and remedies to regain the confidence of citizens in
providing these services?
5. Whether these services help citizens in seek easy justice at a nominal cost?
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
The presented hypotheses will define, examine, and analyze the relationship between relevant dependent and independent variables that are connected to the expertise and commitments of the LACs and the effect that this has on the sheer effectiveness of the legal system. The subsequent research is based on the following hypothesis:
1. There is less efficiency in the application of legal aid laws at the regional level.
2. Beneficiaries' trust and interest have depleted over the years with respect to free legal
aid.
3. There is a deviation from free legal aid to private practitioners or lawyers for resolving
disputes in court.
4. There is sparse awareness about these services at the regional level due to which
citizens are still unaware and deprived of their rights for seeking justice.
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
The following research is based on the doctrinal form of research which includes and includes some aspects of empirical research for relevant data on the legal aid services across the country.
HISTORICAL
BACKGROUND & JUDICIAL PRONOUNCEMENT ON LEGAL AID The legal Aid movement appears to be from the year 1851 when some enactment was introduced in France for providing legal assistance to the indigent. In different states, legal aid schemes were floated through Legal Aid Boards, Societies, and Law Departments. The government of India also started addressing the question of legal aid for the poor in various conferences of Law Ministers and Law Commissions. After the introduction of the Indian Constitution, the Indian government began examining the issue of legal aid for the poor at conferences of Law Ministers and Law Commissions. Manusmriti authorized the King to deliver justice regardless considering his religious wimps. Manusmriti says social, financial, and political justice must be sanctified.
Medieval kings were obligated to apply Islamic law to all matters, regardless of the parties' religion. Jahangir was credited with dispensing fair justice to all, regardless of birth or rank. He said God forbid favoring nobles in justice dispensation. The judge was called Jahangiri Nyaya for his fairness. In 1851, France passed a law to help the poor with legal issues. In 1876, New York City's Legal Aid Society began providing civil legal aid to poor Americans. 8 Since 1952, the Indian government has discussed legal aid for the poor at Law Minister and Law Commission conferences. The government set legal aid guidelines in 1960. Legal Aid Boards, Societies, and Law Departments in multiple states proposed legal aid schemes. The government set legal aid guidelines in 1960. Legal Aid Boards, Associations, and Law Departments in multiple states established legal aid schemes.
In 1950, the government of Bombay established a Committee on Legal Aid and Advice, led by Bhagwati J. The Committee proposed two criteria to determine qualification for legal aid: (I) the prima facie case test, and (II) the means test. The following year, former Calcutta High Court Chief Justice Sir Arthur Trevor Harris proposed another legal assistance plan. The Committee advised that the helped party should not be required to pay court fees, process fees, etc. , and that the Legal Aid Fund should cover these costs9.
Justice P. N. Bhagwati also served as the Chairman of the Legal Aid Committee formed by the Government of Gujarat to recommend ways and means of providing free legal aid and advice to the poor and weaker part of the community, as well as the Chairman of the State Legal Aid Committee in charge of administering the Pilot Project of free Legal Aid and Advice in Gujarat. He worked diligently to establish a sophisticated legal assistance service. He is widely considered the founder of India's legal assistance program, including the establishment of legal help camps in rural regions, collaboration with NGOs, and establishment of legal aid clinics, among other initiatives10. The "Legal Services Authorities Act"11 was passed in 1987 to provide a common statutory foundation for legal aid programs across the country.
The aforementioned Act mandates the establishment of the National Legal Services Authority, as well as their counterparts in each of the country's states and districts, as well as the establishment of Permanent Lok Adalats. The Act also establishes a system through which the National Legal Services Authority may monitor the activities of the State Legal Services Authorities and the State Legal Services Authorities can monitor the activities of the District Legal Services Authorities. So far though, the Legal Services Authorities have fulfilled their onerous duty and discharged their constitutional obligation to guarantee that justice is accessible to all displeased whosoever is in dire need of the same by providing free and competent legal services to the economically and otherwise disadvantaged members of society.
Though some minimal problems occurred, such as the increase of limit of income ceiling of a person who can seek legal services, the credentials and service conditions of the presiding officers of permanent Lok Adalats, etc. , these were rectified by creating rules and regulations under the Act multiple states in accordance with their requirements and the needs of individuals. JUDICIAL PRONOUNCEMENT ON LEGAL AID In India, the “rule of law” is part of the Constitution and principles of natural justice. The Indian constitution states that its citizens' collective purpose is to secure social, economic, and political justice for everyone' Constitutionally, the state must preserve law so that citizens can enjoy security and tranquility. A welfare state's major focus is on achieving justice.
Justice, in a broad sense, is based on the principles and goals of humanity. The term "justice" encompasses a wide range of concepts, from the "justice" that exists in the law to "natural justice" and "democratic justice. " Justice, as stated by Daniel Webster, is one of man's primary concerns on this planet. According to Aristotle, governments without justice are like rubber bands12 since they don't hold their citizens together. The insertion of Article 39A13 under the 42nd amendment led to the introduction of the legal services and rights of the citizens in the state. It is the responsibility of the judiciary, as well as the legislature and the executive, to uphold the Constitution at all levels of government. Legal aid and equitable justice are enshrined in the Constitution, namely in Articles 14, 21, and 22.
Also, when someone is indicted, the state is responsible for paying for that individual to have access to legal help, per Section 30414 of the Criminal Procedure Code. While matters are pending in the Court of Session, it is the state's responsibility to ensure that the provision is followed. The State may, in its sole discretion, expand the scope of this Article to include proceedings in any other State court. The court's ruling is null and unlawful if it was issued in contravention of the provision under Section 304. A person who is unable to pay court costs is exempt from having to do so under the provisions of Order 33 of the CPC, which allows such a person to file lawsuits in front of civil courts.
15 In addition, the civil court has the authority to appoint a legal practitioner to a poor person in cases when that person is unable to make the necessary preparations owing to a variety of circumstances. 16 For efficient justice delivery at the highest court, the Legal Services Authorities Act of 1987 established the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee. A person is eligible for free legal aid from the Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee if they fall into one of the categories listed on their website: they have an annual income of less than Rs. 1. 25Lac; they are members of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe; they are women, children, the mentally ill, or disabled; they are industrial workers; or they are in custody, including protective home custody.
The Committee's assistance covers not only the expense of an Advocate to prepare and argue the case but also the cost of any paperwork related to the case. If you want the Committee to help you with your legal issues, you have to apply to the Secretary and provide them with all the information they need about your case. After determining the applicant's eligibility, the Committee will offer any required legal representation. To implement the NALSA's policies and directives and provide free legal services to the public and hold Lok Adalats in the State, a State Legal Services Authority has been established in each of the States. The State Legal Services Authority is headed by the Honorable Chief Justice of the High Court in each state, who also serves as the Authority's Patron-in-Chief. The organization's Executive Chairman is often a sitting or retired member of the High Court.
The Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA) was established to administer the legal assistance system in Delhi and to oversee the work of the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee. Act 59 of 1994 amended sections 11-A and 11-B to the Legal Services Authorities Act, which deals with Taluk Legal Services. Each state's laws serve as the basis for the Taluk Legal Services Committee's operations. With respect to its make-up, the terms of its services in some states, and the additional duties that have been placed on its shoulders. Post the above revamps there have been significant changes and development pertaining to legal services in India. A kind of alternative dispute resolution, Lok Adalat is a place where parties can come together to reach a negotiated settlement of a legal issue or pre-litigation negotiations.
Since the passage of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Lok Adalats have been recognized by law. The award (judgment) given by the Lok Adalats is final and binding on all parties and there is no appeal against such a decision before any civil court under the aforementioned Act. Although there is no mechanism for appealing a Lok Adalat verdict, the parties retain the right to litigate by initiating a case with the court of proper jurisdiction following the applicable procedure if they are dissatisfied with the outcome. No filing fee is required before a Lok Adalat. If a legal dispute that has been filed in court is referred to the Lok Adalat and is ultimately resolved, the parties will receive a refund of the court money they paid to file their complaints or petitions.
The Supreme Court of India has promoted and protected free legal assistance for poor strata of society and mass catastrophe victims who have no accessibility to Indian courts. The legislature then adopted laws giving free legal assistance in the form of various types of services to eligible people. Let's examine how the Indian Judiciary and Legislature have promoted and protected legal assistance programs.
In “Hussainara Khatoon v. the State of Bihar”17 Article 21 of the Constitution recognizes as a basic right the right to receive free legal aid services, which may include the free services of a legal practitioner for those who are at the bottom of the social hierarchy. The court made the following decision: "There can be no question that quick trial, and by speedy trial, we mean fairly expedient trial, is an important and vital aspect of the basic right to life and liberty inherent in Article 21. " Also in, “Tara Singh v State of Punjab”18 and “Janardhan Reddy v. the State of Hyderabad”19 The court, while adopting an extremely narrow interpretation of the statutory provisions that grant a person the right to an attorney, concluded that this was "a privilege given to accused and he must ask for a lawyer if he wants to engage one or get his relations to engage one for him.
" The sole responsibility that rests on the shoulders of the Magistrate is to provide him with the appropriate opportunities. Even in situations involving the death penalty, the early iteration of the Supreme Court appeared to be unyielding when it proclaimed that "it cannot be put down in every capital case when the accused is unrepresented the trial is vitiated. " Further in “Madhav Hayawadanrao Hoskot v. the State of Maharashtra”20, Justice Krishan Iyer acknowledged “If a prisoner sentenced to incarceration is practically unable to assert his statutory and constitutional right of appeal, including special leave to appeal, due to a lack of legal representation, Article 142 of the Constitution, when read with Articles 21, and 39A, gives the court the power to appoint counsel for the prisoner to ensure complete justice.
The logical conclusion is that this is a state obligation and not government charity. Equally affirmative is the inference that, while legal services must be provided at no cost to the recipient, the attorney must be compensated for his work. Certainly, the profession commits to the public, but its members' charity has little long-term value. Their services must be compensated, especially when they are rendered on behalf of the state. The State in question must pay a reasonable amount, which the court may determine when assigning counsel to the prisoner. The court may evaluate the circumstances and weigh all aspects to determine if legal aid is required for justice in a given instance. In every country where legal aid is provided for free, it is not provided in every case, but only when the public interest is jeopardized otherwise.
” The judiciary has given the Constitution a very broad construction to work the right to free legal aid into the provisions that already exist. The extent of the free legal aid movement in India has expanded as a result of Article 39A. The apex court of India took use of its position and power to direct lower levels of government in India, both at the national and state levels, to create and carry out legal aid programs for members of society who are economically disadvantaged. USA AND FRANCE LEGAL AID SYSTEM The United States and France both have excellent legal assistance systems that other countries may learn from. Providing legal aid to the poor in France dates back to 1851 when the first law of its kind was enacted. The Supreme Court's decision in Gideon v. Wainwright21was a watershed moment in the history of criminal defense in the United States (1963).
A public defender is a government-employed attorney who defends indigent defendants in criminal cases. The workplace of a public defender is a public defender's office. This department is part of the state or county government, and its personnel is civil servants. The Federal Public Defender Program is authorized by Section 3006A of the Criminal Justice Act of 1964. Those who cannot otherwise afford a lawyer in federal criminal cases might take advantage of these services. The federal court will decide if you are entitled to a public defender. Public defense organizations receive public money but are autonomous in their operations. As a result, the government has no say over who they represent or how many lawyers they employ. The federal government provides ample resources for public defenders.
Salary requirements for federal public defenders are set at the same level as those for federal prosecutor's offices. Highly trained lawyers are drawn to and kept by the firm's generous compensation, comprehensive benefits package, and dedicated staff. Civil law is the foundation of the French legal system. So, instead of judges deciding what the law is like in common law states, it is written down and codified. France is home to its distinct network of legal assistance organizations. In France, those in need of legal representation might seek it from the "avocat commis d office," who are lawyers appointed by the courts. This lawyer acts similarly to a public defender in the United States but is not employed by any one legal organization.
It is important to note that the rules for appointing an "avocat commis d'office," as well as his position in the proceedings and the clients he will defend, are distinct from those of other types of advocates. He is responsible for representing everybody who hires him, regardless of their financial situation. In the event that a client cannot afford to pay the advocate's full fee, the advocate will help the client apply for either free or reduced-price legal aid based on the client's income. In such a circumstance, the government may foot the bill for the lawyer's services. The current legal aid scheme is governed by Legal Aid, 1991 which superseded an earlier set of laws from 1972. The receiver of legal aid is excused from paying court fees and is entitled to free representation from an advocate or other legal practitioner (bailiff, notary, auctioneer, etc. ).
People in need of legal representation can make use of the "Maison de Justice," which is typically associated with the local Tribunal. Advocates who represent those who are eligible for pro bono legal services are compensated by the State through the Tribunal d' Instance. At any point in a criminal trial, a defendant, regardless of means, may retain the services of an advocate. "Every accused has the right to defend himself or to be supported by the advocate he picked and, if he cannot afford this advocate, he can seek free assistance," reads Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Thus, in most criminal cases, an advocate is automatically assigned to the accused, but in India, the plethora of lawyers assigned by legal aid authorities is not sufficient to meet the high number of detainees facing trial.
PROBLEMS RELATING TO LEGAL AID IN INDIA
Legal aid as discussed has numerous positives and is developing with time, but there are many negative norms attached to it. Primarily legal aid lawyers are the industry's frontline workers and the services' chief aviators. Competency is the most critical component in any job. Demoralized and inept lawyers might spell doom for the entire reform effort. While LACs undergo rigorous testing before being admitted to the program, it has been noted that they often fall short after they are in active service. The quality of legal services has suffered greatly due to the lack of expertise of the empaneled attorneys resulting in preferring a private counsel instead of a LAC. The skills and knowledge of a private advocate far exceed those of a Legal Aid Counsel. Private attorneys are viewed as more capable than LACs when it comes to argumentation and drafting.
Because of this disparity, low-income people are more likely to hire expensive private attorneys. Secondly, citizens are unaware of their legal rights. It is estimated that almost half of the population in India is illiterate and that 70% of the population still resides in rural areas. Only
76.2 percent of women in the Delhi metropolitan area were aware of legal aid facilities, and
23.8 percent were completely unaware of them22. People are becoming increasingly litigious as
a result of their ignorance of the law. The poor are being denied the protections afforded by law because so few of them understand the law. Lots of government programs meant to help the poor have been introduced, yet the majority of those in need have not benefited. The individuals are victims of social catastrophes because they are unaware of their basic rights. It must be stressed that the current accountability regulations are not inadequate in and of themselves; rather, the issue rests in their application. There are now three techniques for controlling LACs: warnings, replacements, and removals from their cases. However, they are rarely punished severely. According to the rules, as they stand, each state should have a monitoring committee to keep tabs on how things are going with their assigned cases. However, in many places, this has not happened.
The NALSA regulations23 state that Legal Aid Counsels have the right to resign from a case at any time during its continuance, which places a significant burden on the litigants. The LACs have become careless in their service since they are not closely monitored. Despite a requirement for complainants and judges to file complaints against lawyers under the NALSA regulations of 2010, no such records have been kept. It's worth noting that Paragraph
10 of the National Legal Services Act (Free and Competent Legal Services) Regulations 2010
mandates that every legal services institution establish a monitoring Committee to oversee the workings of the legal aid services, including the LACs. The DLSA has a reputation for being slow to act, even when complaints of this nature are submitted to them. The current LAC empanelment mechanism does not incentivize the promotion of legal aid services, nor does it punish the non-performer LACs. It appears that lawyers who represent entertainers and those who do not are given equal treatment. There is no mention of a backup system for LACs to rely on for help and assistance during the litigation process. It has been noted that legal assistance attorneys do not put out much effort into their cases. The quality of their services has suffered as a result of their lack of dedication.
When people receive legal aid, they often lose faith in the system and end up hiring private attorneys instead. Litigants accuse LACs of being uncommunicative, unreliable, and argumentative. When compared to civil courts, Lok Adalats have relatively diminutive authority. To begin with, there is a lack of established protocols. Therefore, they have no power to compel participants to attend the hearing. The disposal can be delayed if one of the parties does not show up to the hearing. These paralegal volunteers' primary responsibility is to publicize legal aid camps and programs and to reach out to the underprivileged and vulnerable members of society. However, these paralegal volunteers are not adequately trained, monitored, or verified. Additionally, the number of volunteers is minimal in comparison to the general population.
Statistics of legal aid provided under the National Legal Service Authorities Act, 197824
SUGGESTIONS &
CONCLUSION
The present legal aid services are revamped and upgraded. The old normative and perception of ineffectiveness is getting depleted over years due to the active steps taken by the judiciary and legal counsels. However, the system requires certain modifications and suggestions in order to increase its efficiency and fulfilling the purpose of free legal aid services.
1. Educating the country's poor, illiterate population about the law and their basic rights is an
urgent matter that must begin at the grassroots level. The judiciary can't run a legal literacy program without help from the state's executive branch.
2. In light of the widening wealth gap in today's society, the judicial system should devote
greater resources to Legal Aid. Providing access to free legal representation is a crucial component of achieving distributive justice and ending discrimination against the poor on both the individual and institutional levels.
3. Although numerous laws and precedents exist to protect the guarantee of access to pro bono
legal representation, in practice this protection has largely been meaningless to the average citizen. Thus, the current imperative is to concentrate on effective and proper implementation of the laws which are already in place rather than enacting new regulations to make legal services in the state a reality and not a myth in the minds of the citizens.
4. Legal aid organizations at every level should employ effective forms of alternative dispute
resolution (ADR) in order to hasten the process of compromise between the parties and ensure the case is resolved once and for all.
5. Poor people must be guaranteed access to legal counsel in the event of an arrest or detention
by the police or other government officials, as well as throughout any subsequent court procedures. It is a well-established fact that those with no economic security or so-called social-economic standing are disproportionately represented among the victims of police torture or cruel treatments, including those that result in death. Human Right Commissions and State Legal Services Authorities are urged to oversee the creation of voluntary Free Legal Aid and Human Right Monitoring Cells in all police stations to protect citizens from such atrocities and inhumane treatment or practice as an infringement of their fundamental rights and the Human Rights25.
6. Having the necessary expertise is crucial to providing high-quality services in any field. It
is generally accepted that legal aid attorneys are the primary players in and leaders of the legal aid system. Without knowledgeable and dedicated LACs, the legal aid system would stagnate and fail to thrive. Providing legal aid is doomed to failure if LACs are not thoroughly knowledgeable in the applicable areas of law and practice.
7. The examination of LACs' competence must be conducted.
8. In addition, the standard of legal aid services has suffered as a result of LACs'
incompetence. The difficulties with incompetent LACs have harmed the quality of legal aid services across the entire Nation. Because of their incompetence and apathy, LACs have failed to meet the high standards set by their beneficiaries.
9. Honorarium to the LACs is rarely paid within a reasonable timeline because of the
complicated, technical, and drawn-out nature of the process. Making a payment is not required immediately. When the honorarium is paid excessively late, it undermines the dedication of the LACs. Most LACs claim that they have to wait years to receive their honorarium. At the moment cases are assigned, no adequate money is paid in advance to the LACs. The LACs will bear all costs associated with filing a lawsuit or other legal action. Because of this, the replies have started demanding financial support from the recipients.
10. Comprehensive records on concerns raised by judicial officers and consumers against
LACs are rarely kept or maintained. The current empanelment mechanism for LACs does neither incentivize good performance nor penalize poor performance to increase access to legal aid. It would appear that LACs are performers and those who are not being treated equally.
CONCLUSION
The introduction of free legal services by LACs is a significant step taken by the government in ensuring the rightful purpose of “justice of all”. The present scenario suggests that judicial bodies are actively acknowledging the need for such legal support to the citizens and are working with good efficiency. However, there is substantial scope for improvement in the current structure of governance of the legal aid services offered by the LACs. If the recommended suggestions are taken into consideration & implemented, the quality of legal aid services will undoubtedly be improved, thereby restoring the confidence of legal aid recipients and maximizing the use of public resources to offer comprehensive, expedient, and affordable justice to the poor.
The efficiency of laws made for governing this system must be effectively looked upon. There is no need for fresh legislation but the present ones must be fairly implemented. Parallelly, the efficiency of LACs must be taken into immediate consideration. There must be a system of checks and balances to monitor their progress and redressal numbers. The interest & honorarium of such counsels should also be released on an immediate basis in order to maintain their efficiency and effectiveness. Regular workshops and training programs should be organized for LACs to enhance their legal and drafting skills this will lead to barring the shift from such counsels to private personnel. The appointed para-legal volunteers should also be trained and asked to promote the concept at the regional level.
Distributive justice, efficient welfare benefits delivery, and the end of social and institutional discrimination against the poor are the primary goals of legal aid. It operates under the Legal Services Authority Act of 1987, which regulates the provision of free legal aid.
REFERENCES:
1. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3817350
2. https://www.worldwidejournals.com/indian-journal-of-applied-research-
(IJAR)/recent_issues_pdf/2016/February/February_2016_1454587952 223.pdf
3. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348621506_A_STUDY_ON_AWARENES
S_TOWARDS_LEGAL_AID_AMONG_GENERAL_PEOPLE_IN_SELECTED_R URAL_REGIONS_OF_PUNJAB
4. https://www.ijlmh.com/paper/equal-justice-and-free-legal-aid/
5. https://nalsa.gov.in/
6. http://dslsa.org/
7. https://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT1133494.pdf
8. https://www.probono-india.in/Indian-
Society/Paper/35_CONSTITUTIONAL%20PROVISIONS%20FOR%20LEGAL%20 AID%20-%20Silky%20Mukherjee.pdf