LawSphereX

Sheke Akram Sheke Mahboob v. The State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: T.MADHAVI DEVI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-11-27. Sheke Akram Sheke Mahboob v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...

Judgment text

\. [ 321e ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEI\iIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 36175 OF 2025 Between: Sheke Akram Sheke Mahboob, S/o. Sheke Mahaboob, Aged about 57 years, 0cc- Business, R/o. Chikhil (BU), Tehsil Kinwat, Nanded District Maharaska State. Presentiy residing R/o 2-1 1 Pittal wada, Adilabad Town Adilabad Dist- ... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Tetangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Forest Department' Dr. B. R. Ambedka-elangaha State Secretariat, Khairtabad, Hyderabad 2 The District Forest Officer, Adilabad District, at. Adilabad J The Divisional Forest Officer, Echoda Division,Adilabad District. 4 The Deputy Forest Range Officer, Echoda, Adilabad District. 5 The Forest Range Officer, Echoda, Adilabad District. ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Anide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 3 to 5 in not releasing the vehicle i. e. Chain JCB (Proclianer) TATA HITACHI Model EX Machine Serial No. EX 110 1101-4561- Proclianer Model 20'11 in favour of the petitioner in POR No. 025 dated 12-05-2025 ( File No 07lORl2O25-26lE) for the offences U/s. 20(1)(C)(ii)(iii)(v)(vii)(x) and 44 of Telangana Forest Act, 1967 in favour of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, and unjust and also in violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 3004 of the constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents No.

3 to 5 to release the vehicle in favour of the petitioner' lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci-, L mstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court mz, be pleased to direct the respondents No. 3 to 5 to release the vehicle i. e. Chain l( Ei (Proclianer) TATA HITACHI Model EX f\,4achine Serial No. EX'1 10 110. 1-4561-t, : clia ner /odel 201 1 :ileNo. in favour of the petitioner in POR No. 025 dated 12-05-2025 \ 07i OR/2025- 26lE) tor the offences U/s. 20(1)(C)(ii)(iii)(v)(vii)(x) and aa r1 Telangana Forest Act, 1967 in favour of the petitioner pending disposal of the nr in writ pet tion. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RUDRESH DESHPANDE Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR FORESTS The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITI ON No. 36175 of2025 L ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief: "...

to issue a ui| order or direction more partianlarlg one in the nature of Wit of Mandamus declaing the action of the respondents I{o. 3 to 5 in not releasing the uehicLe i. e. Chain JCB (Proclianer) TATA HITACHI Model EX Mochine Seial No. EX 110 1101-4561, Proclianer Model 201 1 in fauour of the petitioner in POR No. 025 dated 12-05-2025 (File No. 07/ OR/ 2025-26/ E) the offences U/s. for 20(1)(C)(ii)(iii)(u)(uii)(x) and 44 of Telangana Forest Act, 1967 in fauour of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, and unjust and also in uiolation of Afticles 14, 19, 21 and 3OOA of the Constitution of India and consequentLg direct the respondents No. 3 to 5 to release the uehicle in fauour of the petitioner and to pass... ,, 2. With the consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission. 3. Heard learned counsel lor the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Forests appearing for respondents No. 1 to 5 and perused the entire material on record.

4. l,earned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the subject matter of this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W. P. No-4080 of 2025 dated 13. 02. 2025. "-'' TMD] wp_36175_2025 7. 5. l,earned Government Pleader for Forests har; not disputed the above submission made by the learned <:r r nsel for the petitioner. 6, In view of the above, for the reasons alike in t re said order, 'r this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the petitio r: to make an application to respondent No. 3 lor release of subie :t vehicle, as provided under Section 4a(1) and (3) of the Telangrr rrr Forest Act, 1967, within a period of one (01) week from the dat,: cf receipt of a copy of this order and upon receipt of such aF plication, the respondent No. 3 shall consider the same and pe s s appropriate -: orders, strictly in accordance with law, within a pe rd of one (0 1) week thereafter and duly communicate the decisi,r r on the said application to the petitioner.

There shall be no order i r; to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pendinr; in this Writ Petition, shall sland closed. . SI) SMT. K. MADHAVI sl iTANr REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER " To, t)epartment, Dr The State of Telangana' Fore:; 1. The PrinciP al Secretary, irtaba i State Secretariat, Kha l-lyderabad B. R. Ambed kar Telanga na Adilabec 2. The District Forest Officer, Adilabad District, at' )istrict' Echoda Division'Adilabac 3. The Divisional Forest Officer, D s r ct' 4. The Deputy Forest Range Officer, Echoda' Adilabad The Forest Range Officer, Echoda' Adilabad District' [OPUC] One CC to Sri Rudresh Deshpande, Advocate 6. for the State ol relangana' at Two CCs to GP for Forests, High Court Hyderabad [OUT] q Two CD CoPies HIGH COURT DATED:2711112025 t il ,;,+ ( ;\ ()' ORDER o C) . a 1l]26 0g'. 1 WP. No. 36175 of 2025 * * S,)q 1 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 1( P. >6 ,\

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.