SANJAY KUMAR VERMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2026-04-02. SANJAY KUMAR VERMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No. 97 of 2025 Sanjay Kumar Verma, aged about 59 years, S/o late Sudarshan Ram Verma Present Residence at Behind Birsa Munda Agro Park, Laxman Nagar Gumla, PO & PS-Gumla, District-Gumla Earlier R/o Deputy Commissioner, Residence Road, Gumla, PO and PS- Gumla, Dist. -Gumla ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, having its office at Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, PO and PS-Dhurwa, District Ranchi 2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, PO and PS Dhurwa 3. The Director, Directorate, Panchayati Raj Government of Jharkhand, having its office F. F. P Building, Dhurwa, PO and PS-Dhurwa, District Ranchi 4. District Development Commissioner cum Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Gumla, PO and PS-Gumla, District Gumla 5. Adhyach, Zila Parishad, Gumla, Gumla, PO and PS-Gumla, District Gumla 6.
The Secretary, Zila Parishad, Gumla, Gumla, PO and PS Gumla, District Gumla ... … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sidhartha Roy, Advocate For Opposite Party(s) : Mr. J. F. Toppo, GA-V Mr. Neil Abhijit Toppo, AC to GA-V -------- nd Order No. 03 /Dated: 2 April 2026 Heard learned counsel for the review petitioner. 2. While referring to paragraph no. 5 of the order dated 11. 06. 2025 passed in W. P. (S) No. 6637 of 2018 learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that as per paragraph no. 17 of the Resolution the nd petitioner is entitled for the 2 ACP benefit, however, the same has not been considered by this Court. 3. After going through the order dated 11. 06. 2025 passed in W. P. (S) No. 6637 of 2018 it appears that there is a finding given in the order as such if the petitioner is aggrieved, he may challenge the order before the appellate Court. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the instant Civil Review stands dismissed. 5.
Pending I. As, if any, also stand disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J. ) nd 2 April 2026 Amit Uploaded on 08/04/2026
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.