/5575/2024 of BABULAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
Court: Allahabad High Court
Bench: JASPREET SINGH
Judgment date:
Case summary
Allahabad High Court judgment dated 2024-11-26. /5575/2024 of BABULAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LUCKNOW AND OTHERS. Read the...
Judgment text
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:78401 Court No. - 8 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5575 of 2024 Petitioner :- Babulal Respondent :- State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. , Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C. S. C. ,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that he may be permitted to amend the cause title, inasmuch as the Court before whom the petition has been preferred has not been mentioned. The oral request is accepted and learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to carry out the necessary amendment during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent No. 1 and 2 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Notice on behalf of respondent No. 9 has been accepted by Shri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel.
In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent Nos. 3 to 8 is dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Re. No. 2390 of 2022 (Uday Narayan and another Vs. Babulal and others) pending before respondent No. 2 since 2022. It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the aforesaid case has not yet been decided. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the Rev. No. 2390 of 2022 (Uday Narayan and another Vs.
Babulal and others) as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the respondent No. 2 shall decide the aforesaid case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 26. 11. 2024 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: Allahabad High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.