Shri Samaresh Baidya v. The State of Tripura and 3 Others
Court: High Court of Tripura
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2024-11-30. Shri Samaresh Baidya v. The State of Tripura and 3 Others. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) No. 737 of 2024 Sri Samaresh Baidya ………Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura & Ors. …….. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samar Das, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kohinoor N. Bhattacharya. G. A. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD ORDER 30. 11. 2024 Heard Mr. Samar Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Kohinoor N. Bhattacharya, learned GA appearing for the respondents-State. [2] This present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:- “a. Admit this petition. b. Call for the records from the custody of the respondents. c. Issue Notice upon the Respondents. AND And after hearing the parties be pleased to direct the state respondents for providing all retirement financial benefit w. e. f.
01/09/2021 along with interest to the petitioner as he was an employee as a Special Officer (Survey) (Group- B) post for the period of 24 years & 7 months under the control of the respondents. ” [3] Heard and perused the evidence on record. [4] After perusal of the record, it is seen that the petitioner herein submitted a letter on 06. 01. 2024 addressed to the Dy. Director of Horticulture, O/o the Dy. Director of Horticulture (North), Kumarghat, Unakoti Tripura ventilating his grievances but till date the same is pending. [5] In view of such circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent(s) to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the letter dated 06. 01. 2024 preferably within a period of 03(three) months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order in accordance with law.
It is needless to observe that the petitioner is at liberty to file any specific claim statement before the respondent(s) in the meanwhile. Since, the relief sought pertains to the amounts to be disbursed by the Accountant General through the State and in the instant case the Accountant General has not been made a party, this Court suo-moto impleads Accountant General as respondent No. 5. [6] The address of the Respondent No. 5 to be impleaded as submitted by Mr. Samar Das, learned counsel for the petitioner today before this Court, which reads as under: “O/o the Accountant General (A &E) 79 Tilla, Agartala, P. O-79 Tilla Agartala,West Tripura. ” [7] Registry is directed to do the needful for impleading Accountant General as Respondent No. 5 to this petition and also to send a copy of this order to respondent No. 5 i. e. Accountant General to the above-quoted address. With the above observation and direction, this present writ petition stands disposed of.
As a sequel, miscellaneous application(s), pending if any, shall stand closed. JUDGE Paritosh Digitally signed by SABYASACSABYASACHI GHOSH HI GHOSH Date: 2024. 12. 06 12:06:32 +05'30'
Source: High Court of Tripura. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.