PRABHKIRAN BRAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Bench: MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Punjab and Haryana judgment dated 2025-08-21. PRABHKIRAN BRAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
CRWP No. 9054 of 2025(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. 9054 of 2025(O&M) Date of Order:21. 08. 2025 Prabhkiran Brar . Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Pankaj Bains, Advocate, Mr. Ashish Handa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hardeep Singh Wadhwa, DAG, Punjab. SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL, JUDGE (Oral) 1 The petitioner under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to official respondents to protect her life and liberty and that of her family members. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate direction is issued to respondent no. 2-Director General of Police, Punjab and respondent no. 3-Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar, Mohali, to decide the representations dated 13. 09. 2023 and 19. 08.
2025, Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively, moved by the petitioner and take necessary action. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. 4. Mr. Hardeep Singh Wadhwa, DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that needful shall be done in due course. CRWP No. 9054 of 2025(O&M) -2- 5. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 2-Director General of Police, Punjab and respondent no. 3-Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar, Mohali, to decide the aforesaid representations dated 13. 09. 2023 and 19. 08. 2025, Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of two months from today and take necessary action, if so required. 6. In case, respondent no.
3 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representations, Annexures P-1 and P-2, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law. 7. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE th 21 August, 2025 nt Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.