CHINTA MANI v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2025-10-28. CHINTA MANI v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 16658 of 2025 alongwith connected matters th Decided on: 28 October, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No. 16658 of 2025 Yadvender Kumar ….. Petitioner Versus State of H. P. and another ..... Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No. 16660 of 2025 Chinta Mani ….. Petitioner Versus State of H. P. and another ..... Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CWP No. 16662 of 2025 Om Prakash ….. Petitioner Versus State of H. P. and another ..... Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. CWP No. 16666 of 2025 Mamta ….. Petitioner Versus State of H. P. and another ..... Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms.
Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. For the Petitioners: Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y. P. S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y. P. S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations dated 25. 08. 2025 (Annexure P-2) seeking 2 applicability of Hem Raj Versus State of H. P. and others have not been decided till date by the respondents/ competent authority.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the CWP No. 2171 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matters on 04. 09. 2023 respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners dated 25. 08. 2025 (Annexure P-2) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case 2 of Hem Raj within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 28, 2025 Judge Mukesh
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.