Safi Khan v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-01-20. Safi Khan v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE I SREENIVAS RAO Criminal Petition Nos. 5347 and 5348 of 2021 Crl. P. No. 5347 ot2027 Between: 1. Rehanl_Begrm,W / o Safi Khan, Aged about 56 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Mani Tola, . Nizam Nagar, Patthar Road Hinoo, Doranda, Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002. 2. Md Hayat Khan, S/o Safi Khan, Aged about 27 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Mani Tola, Nizam Nagar, Patthar Road Hinoo, Doranda, Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002. ... Petitioners/ Accused Nos. 3 & 5. AND 1. The. State of Telangana, R! p. Uy its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, High Court, Hyderabad, Through SHO,. P. S. Chikkadpally, Hyderabad. 2. K. srinivasa Rao, s/o K. Jagan, Age 54 years, Eshwarapuri Colony, Sainikpuri, Hyderabad. ". ;t;illl::::il7}ffilf""t .. Respondent/ Complainant. Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.
C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against Accused No. 3 and 5 in FIR No. 267/2021. dt. 06/07/2021 of p. S. Chikkadpally, Hyderabad Disrrict, for the offence under Sec-420, 406IPC. I. A. NO: 2OF 2027 Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings against Accused No. 3 and 5 in FIR No. 267/2021, dt. 06/07/2021 of p. S. Chikkadpally, Hyderabad District, for the offence under 5ec. 420,406 IPC. This Petition coming on for hearing, uI,, r't perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and rpon hearing the arguments of Sri Nageshwar Rao Pujari, Advocate for tht l? etitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 antl ,:'f the Respondent No. 2 not appearing in person or through his counsel. Crl. P. No.
5348 of 2021 Between: Safi Khan, S/o. late Wali Khan, Aged about 60 years, Occ. I usiness, R/o. Mani Tola, Nizam Nagar, Patthar Road Hinoo, Doranda, Ii nchi, Jharkhand- 834002. .. Petiti r rers/ Accused No1 AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, lli ;h Court Buildings, High Court, Hyderabad, rhrough sHo,. P. s. chiH*? ,] l;"Tr1i:3i:*. "", 2 K. Srinivasa Rao, S/o K. Jagan, Age 54 years, Occ. Busirr, ss, R/o 704/ A, Eshwarapuri Colony' sainikpuri' Hyderabad' ... Respo r renr/Comprainant. Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P. C praying that r the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Peti. r rn, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against Ar', used No. 1 in FIR No. 267/2027 dt. 06/07/2021 of P. S. Chikkadpally, Hycr rabad District, for the offence under Sec. 420, 406 IPC. I. A. NO: zOF2027 Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.
C praying that r the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Peti : rn, the High Court may be pleased to stay aII further proceedings against 'etitioner/ Accused No. 1 in FIR No. 267/2027 dt. 06/O7/2027 of P. S. Chikkr [pa1ly, Hyderabad District, for the offence under 5ec. 420,406 IPC. This Petition coming on for hearing, Lrl) )rr perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and r: pon hearing the arguments of Sri Nageshwar Rao Pujari, Advocate for tlLr Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 aIr,l of the Respondent No. 2 not appearing in person or through his counsel. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos. 5347 and 5348 of 2O2l Date:20. 0I. 2026 Crl. P. No. 5347 of 2021 Between: Rehana Begum and another .. Petitioners AND The State of Telangana, Rep.
by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, High Court, Hyderabad, Through SHO, P. S. Chikkadpally, Hyderabad and another ... Respondents Crl. P. No. 5348 of202l Between: Safi Khan, S/o. late Wali Khan ... Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, ,} Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, \ High Court Buildings, High Court, Hyderabad, Through SHO, ( P. S. Chikkadpally, Hyderabad and another. { Respondents COMMON ORDER When these matters were taken up for hearing, . r s. N. Geetha, learned counsel representing Sri Nageshwar Rao l) rjari, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the cause in r rese criminal petitions does not survive on the ground that, during tt. t pendency of these criminal petitions, the Investigating Officer, af r r conducting the investigation, filed the final report before tl competent j urisdictional Magistrate. 2. In view of the above, the cause in the criminal :titions I does not survive for adjudication. 3.
Accordingly, the criminal petitions are rl ,imissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any r;hall stand closed. iD/. B. REKHA RANI AS! ; STANT REGISTRAR , 1) / /TRUECOPY/ / ! ;] CTION OFFICER To, I 1. The IX Additional Chief Metropolitan ,Cerabad. Magistrate at Il 2 The Station House Officer, Chikkadpally Folice Statior . Flyderabad. CC to Sri Nageshwar Rao Pujari, Advocare ]l ? 9"" [OpU 4. One CC to the Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildinr ,;, Hyderabad lourl 5. Two CD Copies. ICK/PSL HIGH COURT DATED:2}/01/2026 F . HE C1\. o 14 t 4 5 rJ COMMONORDER 1 1. ,! /v" ,).. * CRLP. Nos. 5347 & 5348 of 2027 Or^ Dismissing the Criminal Petitions as infructuous &
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.