Skip to main content
LawSphereX

RAMESHWAR KISKU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Court: High Court of Jharkhand

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2025-12-22. RAMESHWAR KISKU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- A. B. A. No. 7442 of 2025 ---- Rameshwar Kisku aged about 21 years son of Sitaram Kisku, resident of Village Jaraki, PO and PS Amrapara, Dist. Pakur, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Md Yasir Arafat, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Someshwar Roy, Advocate ---- 2/22. 12. 2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Amrapara P. S. Case No. 15 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 127(2), 137(2), 308(2), 308(3), 308(5), 305(a), 74, 76, 109, 351(2), 352 of BNS 2023, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur. 3.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the only allegation against the petitioner is that he has accompanied with Suraj Tudu (Dishom Guru), who is an aged person. He next submits that the coaccused person has been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No. 4236 of 2025. 4. He submits that he had no active role so far, the panchayati is concerned. The Panchayat has taken a decision of imposing fine and the petitioner is also not village Pradhan of village Jamkanali. 5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there. 6. In the FIR, it has only come, that the petitioner has accompanied Suraj Tudu, who is said to be aged person and Dishom Guru. Apart from this, there is no allegation against the petitioner and coaccused person has been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No. 4236 of 2025, I am inclined to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail. 7.

Accordingly, the petitioner above named is directed to surrender before the learned Court within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on the event of his surrender / arrest, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur in connection with Amrapara P. S. Case No. 15 of 2025. 8. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. ) 22. 12. 2025 SI/

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.