Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Nawab Akram Hussain Khan v. The State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: T.MADHAVI DEVI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-17. Nawab Akram Hussain Khan v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...

Judgment text

[ 3219 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 38810 OF 2025 Between: Nawab Akram Hussain Khan S/o Late Nawab Dost lt/ohammed Khan, Aged about 73 years, Occ: Business, Rl/o 501-8, 3-6-36'1/9, Ashrey Arcade, Street No. 20, Behind Hydari Club, Himayat Nagar, Hyderabad, Telangana State .. PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary l\4inority Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 Telangana State Waqf Board, Rep by its Chief Executive Officer, Ha. i House, Namplally, Hyderabad Telangana State ... RESPONDENTS .

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent No. 2 not appointing the Petitioner as Hereditary l\4utawalli of Jama Masjid and Graveyard, Ramnastpura, Bahadurpura, Hyderabad, Telangana State, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 to appoint the Petitioner as Hereditary IVlutawalli of Jama tVlasjid and Graveyard, Ramnastpura, Bahadurpura, Hyderabad, Telangana State. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thr: circumsta nces stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co rt may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.

2 to appoint the Petitioner as ll >red itary [Vlutawalli of Jama Masjid and Graveyard, Ramnastpura, Bah:,r u rpu ra, Hyderabad, Telangana State, by considering the representatio r dated 26. 11. 2025, 25. 11. 2055 & 10. 11 2025 made by the Petitioner, pendinr; Cisposal of main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ABDUL KABEER Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP FOR SOCIAL WEL: \RE qN, Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: SRI FARHAN AZAM Kll S. C. FOR TSWB The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WzuT PETITION No. 38810 of 2025 Date: 17. 12. 2025 Between: Narvab Akram Hussain Khan . . . Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Represented by its PrincipaI Secretary, V inority Wellare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another. . . . Respondents ORDER This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.

2 in not appointing the Petitioner as the Hereditary Mutawalli of Jama Masjid and Graveyard, Ramnastpura, Bahadurpura, Hyderabad, Telangana State, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct respondent No. 2 to appoint the petitioner as the Hereditary Mutawalli of Jama Masj id and Graveyard, Ramnastpura, Bahadurpura, Hyderabad. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the ', t t petitioner's father was initiatly appointed as Mutawalli of the subject ! l ! Masjid and after his demise, petitioner's elder brother was appointed. i I i I I I I TI/DJ wp_3881O_2025 Leamed counsel for the petitioner subrnitted that sin: : the petitioner's elder brother also passed away, the petition,: has made a representation dated 26. 11. 2025 requesting app: ntment as the I{ereditary Mutarvalli. The grievance of the pcLrr . rner is that the respondents har,e not takcn an1, action on the said r:presentation till date. r-- 3. Sri Farhan Azarn Khan. lean.

red Standine )unscl lor Wakf Board, appearing lor respomlent No. 2, sLLb r itted that the representation o1- the petitioner would be considcrc I in the second meeting of tl're Wakf Board 4. In vicr. r, of the same, this Writ Petition is 1 sposed of at the admission stagc, with a direction to respondent No. to consider the representation ol the petitioner in the second mcct ng of the Wakf Board and to pass appropriate orders expeditiousll, 5. With thc above directions, this Writ Petiti r r is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous ap rlications, if any, pending in tliis Writ Petition, shall stand closed SD/-U. SUDHA A. Sli STANT RFSSTRAR /a- //TRUE COPY// SEcTI6idoFFICER To 1. The Chief Executive Officer, Telangana State Watl Board, Haj House, Namplally, Hyderabad Telangana State 2. One CC to SRI ABDUL KABEER, Advocate IOPUC] '-rWI ry 3. Two CCs to GP for Social Welfare, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 4.

One CC to SRI FARHAN AZAM KHAN, S. C. for TSWB [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies MP Y4- BS HIGH COURT DAI ED:1711212025 1H SIA 16' , c r_) ? il irl{ r. : I $ , I : -r( t.. i i I i t ORDER I ! I WP. NI:,38810 of 2025 I I I l i ti l 1 I li l j I l l l l ; DISPOSING I OF THE \'! 'RIT PETITION I i WII HOUT COSTS I I I I di ,6'. \ o \q 6r€u

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.