SMT KANAKAMMA v. MR ROSHAN MANAVALAN
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: R. NATARAJ
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-03-26. SMT KANAKAMMA v. MR ROSHAN MANAVALAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - RFA No. 1040 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 26 DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1040 OF 2024 (DEC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. KANAKAMMA W/O. VENKATESHULU AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/AT NO. 113, JAYAMMA BUILDING MEDAHALLI VILLAGE VIRGONAGAR POST BENGALURU - 560049 2. SMT. NAGARATHNA D/O. VENKATESHULU W/O. JAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS ND R/AT NO. 55, 2 MAIN RD 3 CROSS, MEDAHALLI EXTENSION VIRGONAGAR POST Digitally BENGALURU - 560049 signed by HEMALATHA J 3. SMT. CHANDRAKALA Location: W/O. GUNASHEKAR HIGH COURT OF D/O. VENKATESHULU KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO. 113, JAYAMMA BUILDING MEDAHALLI VILLAGE VIRGONAGAR POST BENGALURU 560049 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. BABU D R. , ADVOCATE) - 2 - RFA No. 1040 of 2024 AND: 1. MR. ROSHAN MANAVALAN S/O. SRI. T MANAVALAN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT NEW NO. 22, OLD NO. 20 GOPALKRISHNA ROAD, T. NAGAR CHENNAI - 600017 2. MR. SHARATH MANAVALAN S/O. SRI. T.
MANAVALAN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS RA/T NEW NO. 22, OLD NO. 20 GOPALKRISHNA ROAD, T. NAGAR CHENNAI - 600017 3. MR. RAMESH S/O. LATE VENKATESHULU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO. 319, OM SAI NILAYA ST ST 1 MAIN, 1 CROSS NEAR SATSANG ASHRAM MEDAHALLI VILLAGE VIRGONAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560049 4. MR. RAJ KUMAR S/O. LATE VENKATESHULU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO. 113, JAYAMMA BUILDING MEDAHALLI VILLAGE VIRGONAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560049 …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC. , AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20. 02. 2024 PASSED ON IA NO. III IN OS NO. 1793/2018 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, - 3 - RFA No. 1040 of 2024 BENGALURU. , ALLOWING THE IA NO. III FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE (a) AND (d) OF CPC. , FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.
NATARAJ ORAL JUDGMENT There is no representation for the appellants. 2. The office objections are not complied, despite granting six opportunities. 3. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. In view of dismissal of main appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any do not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No. : 1 Sl No. : 4
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.