PUSHAPA JAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: DINESH MEHTA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2020-12-15. PUSHAPA JAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13342/2020 1. Pushapa Jain D/o Shri Ramji Lal Jain, Aged About 47 Years, R/o C, 5 Laxmi Colony Naya Kheda Jaipur District Jaipur, Rajasthan. At Present Working Teacher Grade III Level - II At Government Upper Primary School Kasha Ka Bass Karansar Sabharlek, Jaipur. 2. Swita Paliwal D/o Shri Satyanarayan Paliwal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Paliwal Baba Shyam Colony, Jaipur, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. At Present Working Teacher Grade III Level - II At Government Upper Primary School Sitapura Sanganer, Jaipur. 3. Tamanna Meena D/o Shri Ramavtar Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Railway Quartos 2076-A Roadways, Bus Ka Piche, Ajmer, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. At Present Working Teacher Grade - III Level II At Government Upper Primary School, Dausa. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2.
The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan. 3. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan. 4. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Pali, Rajasthan. 5. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education Pali, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ambalal Bhati through Cisco Webex App JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Judgment 15/12/2020 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied, if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider their representation/notice for demand of justice expeditiously. (2 of 2) [CW-13342/2020] 2. The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the direction to the respondents No. 2 and 3 to consider and decide petitioners’ representation, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six weeks from placing of certified copy of the order instant. 3. The petitioners may file photostat copy of notice for demand of justice dated 02. 11.
2020, while placing certified copy of the order instant. 4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner’s grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner. 5. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly. (DINESH MEHTA),J 99-Ramesh/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.