MOHD.IQBAL v. AJIT KUMAR SAHU SECY.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ANR.
Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2024-12-23. MOHD.IQBAL v. AJIT KUMAR SAHU SECY.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
Sr. No. 136 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: CPSW No. 742/2018 In SWP No. 2816/2017 Mohd Iqbal …. Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through :- None. V/s Ajit Kumar Sahu Secy. Education Deptt and …. Respondent(s) another Through :- Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 23. 12. 2024 It has been brought to the notice of this Court by Mr. Raman Sharma, learned AAG that the Apex Court in SLP No. 17409 of 2021 in case titled, “U. T. of Jammu and Kashmir and others Vs. Jatinder Singh and another”, has already put a rider that no appointment henceforth be made insofar as the Rehbar-e-Taleem (ReT) is concerned and in the instant contempt petition, the petitioner is seeking compliance of the order dated 08. 12. 2017, whereby a direction was issued to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner in the light of recommendations made by CEO, Poonch as well as ZEO, Surankote as ReT. Thus, according to Mr.
Raman Sharma, learned AAG, the order passed by this Court in the light of the rider imposed by Apex Court, could not be implemented. This is the precise reason perhaps and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner as well. In view of the above, proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged. Contempt petition, is accordingly, ‘disposed of’. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu: 23. 12. 2024 Renu Bala Renu 2024. 12. 24 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Source: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.