JEEVAN HORO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-07. JEEVAN HORO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 9128 of 2020 ------ Jeevan Horo … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. K. S. Nanda, Advocate For the State : Mr. Someshwar Roy, Addl. P. P. ------ Order No. 02 Dated- 07. 12. 2020 Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over. In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Karra P. S. Case No. 41 of 2020 registered under sections 385/387/120B of the Indian Penal Code and under section 17 of the CLA Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons used to threaten the informant in the name of Jetha Kachhap and demanded Rs. 5,00,000/- as extortion. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the main allegation is against the said Jetha Kachhap. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11. 09. 2020 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 13 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the co-accused has already been released on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 30. 09. 2020, passed in B. A. No. 6860 of 2020. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P. P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the st satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1 Class, Khunti, in connection with Karra P. S. Case No. 41 of 2020 with the condition that he will cooperate with the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. ) Sonu-Gunjan/
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.