SMT. BANDANA KUSHWAHA v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-05. SMT. BANDANA KUSHWAHA v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK th ON THE 5 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 2756 of 2024 BETWEEN:- 1. SMT. BANDANA KUSHWAHA W/O SHRI DHARMENDRA SINGH D/O SHRI GYAN SINGH, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEIWIFE LAXMIBAI COLONY JWALAPURA PS PADAD DISTRICT GWALIOR AT PRESENT VILLAGE DEEH PS UNNAV DISTRICT UNNAV (UP) (UTTAR PRADESH) 2. DHARMENDRA SINGH S/O SHRI TEJBHAN SINGH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DRIVER MARIMATA MAHALGAON DIST. GWALIOR AT PRESENT VILLAGE DEEH PS UNNAV DIST. UNNAV (UTTAR PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHR RAMKISHORE SHARMA - ADVOCATE ) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL M. P. (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DISTRICT GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER POLICE STATION PADAV DISTRICT GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. GYAN SINGH S/O SHRI HALKAI KUSHWAHA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, LAXMIBAI COLONY JWALAPURA PS PADAD DIST.
GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI M. S. JADON - GOVT. ADVOCATE ) This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following: ORDER Petitioners are present in person. 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been preferred by the petitioners seeking following reliefs:- "a. That, the respondents No. 2 and 3 may kindly be directed to grant proper protection to the petitioners against the harassment of respondent No. 4. b. Any relief which deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court in the fact and circumstances of the case c. Cost may be awarded in the interest of justice. " 2 . From perusal of cause title and their documents, it appears that petitioner No. 2/husband is resident of Villege Deeh, Police Station Unnav, District Unnav (UP) and married to a girl who is now living with him at Unnav. He is seeking protection for the jurisdiction which does not fall within the jurisdiction of this Court. Therefore, said relief is declined. 3.
However, counsel for petitioners fairly submits that they may be given liberty to appear before the Station House Officer, Police Station Padav, District Gwalior in accordance with law as and when required. Petitioners are ready to appear before them. 4. Counsel for respondents fairly submits that if they appear and require in investigation then police shall proceed in accordance with law. 5. Prayer noted. 6. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (ANAND PATHAK) JUDGE Van VANDANA VERMA 2024. 02. 05 16:11:44 +05'30'
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.