Amarjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2026-04-29. Amarjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 27540 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -219 Year-2025 Thana- BARHIYA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1. Amarjeet Kumar S/o Anil Mochi R/o Village-Khutahadih, P. S. -Barhaiya, (Barahiya), District-Lakhisarai. 2. Bunti Kumar @ Banti Kumar S/o Sanjay Mochi R/o Village-Khutahadih, P. S. -Barhaiya, (Barahiya), District-Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brajesh Sahay, Advocate Mr. Umesh Prasad, Advocate Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 29-04-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2.
The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Barahiya P. S. Case no. 219 of 2025, registered under sections 126(2), 115, 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, the ten named accused persons including the two petitioners herein as also 8-10 other accused are said to have brutally assaulted the informant with lathi, danda etc. Co-accused Shyam Kumar is said to have snatched Rs. 11,000/- from his possession. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 27540 of 2026(2) dt. 29-04-2026 2/2 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. Besides the allegations being general and omnibus in nature, the injury report does not support the allegation of assault by so many persons. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and undertake to cooperate in the investigation/trial. 5.
The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A. P. P. for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioners in the F. I. R. , the allegations being general and omnibus in nature and the petitioners not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that both the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Barahiya P. S. Case no. 219 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai. (Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.