Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Bishunudeo Prasad Yadav @ Bishundeo Yadav @ Bishnudeo Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Court: Patna High Court

Bench: MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

Judgment date:

Case summary

Patna High Court judgment dated 2024-12-06. Bishunudeo Prasad Yadav @ Bishundeo Yadav @ Bishnudeo Mahto v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case...

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3217 of 2024 ====================================================== 1. Bishunudeo Prasad Yadav @ Bishundeo Yadav @ Bishnudeo Mahto Son of Late Shree Lal Mahto, Resident of Village- Siraiya P. S. - Sahebpur Kamal, District- Begusarai. 2. Doman Yadav @ Doman Mahto, Son of Late Shree Lal Mahto, Resident of Village- Siraiya P. S. - Sahebpur Kamal, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Chairman, Bihar State Board of Religious Trust Board Vidyapati Marg, Patna. 3. The Bihar State Board of Religious Trust Vidyapati Marg, Patna through its Superintendent. 4. The Administrator-cum-Special Officer, Bihar State Board of Religious Trust Vidyapati Marg, Patna. 5. The Superintendent, Bihar State Board of Religious Trust Vidyapati Marg, Patna. 6. The Collector, Begusarai. 7. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Balia, Begusarai. 8.

The Circle Officer, Sahebpur Kamal Block, Police Station Sahebpur Kamal, District- Begusarai. 9. Harbansh Mahto, Resident of Village- Siraiya, P. S. Sahebpur Kamal, District- Begusarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, AC to Government Pleader 4 For the Respondent no. 2 to 5 : Mr. Shekhar Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 06-12-2024 In this case on 06. 09. 2024, three weeks time was granted to the petitioner to remove the defects. Since it was a peremptory order and the said order has not been complied with within the stipulated time of three weeks, the same stood rejected on 27. 09. 2024 itself. 2. Perused the file. 3. Consigned. (Rajiv Roy, J) perwez U

Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.