Sri Anjan Sarkar and 16 others v. The State of Tripura and 2 others
Court: High Court of Tripura
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2024-01-16. Sri Anjan Sarkar and 16 others v. The State of Tripura and 2 others. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) No. 22 of 2024 Sri Anjan Sarkar & 16 Ors. Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura & 02 Ors. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arijit Bhaumik, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. R. Chakraborty, Advocate HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD ORDER 16. 01. 2024 This present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant increment in favour of the petitioners as per Note-2 of Rule 13 (I) (V) of the Tripura State Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009 introduced by the th Tripura State Civil Services (Revised Pay) (5 Amendment) Rules, 2009 notified vide Notification dated 06. 01. 2011 w. e. f. 01. 01. 2006. The petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:- “I. Issue notice upon the Respondents. II. Call for the Records. III.
Issue Rule calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why the Petitioners shall not be granted the benefit of one increment under Note-2 of Rule 13(1) (V) of the TSCS ( RP) Rules, 2009 along with all arrears of financial benefit. AND Issue Rule calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why th the memorandum dated 6 July, 2011 issued by the Finance Department, Government of Tripura shall not be set aside and quashed. AND Issue Rule calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why the Memorandum dated 16. 10. 2007 issued by the Finance Department, Govt. of Tripura shall not be set aside and quashed. AND/OR IV. And after hearing the parties, be pleased to make the rule absolute” Heard Mr. Arijit Bhaumik, learned counsel appearing for the Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned counsel appears on behalf of the State-respondents. It is seen from record that the petitioners have submitted representation through their respective learned counsel in the form of legal notice dated 19. 12.
2023 addressed to the Director of Secondary Education, Government of Tripura but they got no response. In view of above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Official-respondents to consider the representation dated 19. 12. 2023 made by the petitioners before the respondents in accordance with law within a period of 3 (three) months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous application(s), pending if any, shall stand closed. JUDGE Digitally signed by SABYASACHI SABYASACHI GHOSH Date: 2024. 01. 19 17:25:28 +05'30' GHOSH
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.