Smt. Sabitri Banik Laskar v. THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND 2 OTHERS
Court: High Court of Tripura
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2026-06-16. Smt. Sabitri Banik Laskar v. THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND 2 OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C)No. 125 of 2026 Smt. Sabitri Banik Laskar, W/O Lt. Joy Laskar, Ex. Work Assistant. Presently Residing at:- C/O Shri Sajal Banik, st Ramkrishna Palli (Adjacent to T. U. 1 Gate), Suryamaninagar, P. O. & P. S. Amtali, West Tripura, PIN:799 130 ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Tripura (Represented by its Secretary), P. W. D. (R & B), Civil Secretariat, P. O. & P. S. NCC, Agartala, West Tripura: 799 010 2. The Engineer-in-Chief, Office of the Chief Engineer, PWD (R & B), th rd 7 Block, 3 Floor, New Secretariat Complex, Agartala, West Tripura, PIN:799 010 3. The Executive Engineer, Agartala Division No. III, P. W. D. (R & B), Government of Tripura, Agartala, West Tripura, PIN:799 001 ----Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prasanta Kr. Pal, Adv. Mr. Abhinandan Pal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dipankar Sarma, Addl. G. A. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT Order 16/06/2026 Learned Counsel for the petitioner is present. Learned Addl. G. A.
appears for the State-respondents. It is informed by Learned Addl. G. A. that by this time the offer of appointment has been issued by the respected department in favour of the petitioner by memo dated 12. 06. 2026. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that, due to six months delay in appointing the petitioner, the petitioner had to suffer some hardships. Learned Addl. G. A. submitted that in a case under Die-in-harness Scheme generally the appointment is issued in the months of January/July. So the delay was not inordinate. This Court also agrees with the submission of the Learned Addl. G. A. appearing for the State-respondents and this Court does not find any reason to proceed with this case for further adjudication. Accordingly this writ petition stands disposed of. For further grievances, if any, the petitioner is at liberty to file separate petition. JUDGE Moumita
Source: High Court of Tripura. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.