SHRI RAM KUNCHR v. NEXSYS CONTROLS PVT LTD
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-24. SHRI RAM KUNCHR v. NEXSYS CONTROLS PVT LTD. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 14305 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 24 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 14305 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI RAM KUNCHR S/O SHRI N S KUNCHUR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/A NO 37, SHRI GANESH ENCLAVE, HARAGADDE, BENGALURU 560015 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NEGLUR ARAVIND. ,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. NEXSYS CONTROLS PVT LTD NO 123, 7TH MAIN, 3RD BLOCK, Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI GNANABHARATHI LAYOUT, MURTHY Location: HIGH NEAR DUBASHI PALYA LAKE, COURTOF KENGERI SATELLITE TOWN, KARNATAKA BENGALURU 560059 REP HEREIN BY ITS CEO SHRI CHANDRASHEKAR HIREMATH OR MD, SHRI SUNEESH NAIR 2. BOSH LIMITED POST BOX NO 3000, HOSUR ROAD, ADUGODI BANGALORE 560030 INDIA, - 2 - WP No. 14305 of 2024 REP HEREIN BY ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KSHAMA NARGUND, ADVOCATE FOR R1: SMT. JANANI R. , FOR SRI B. S.
SANDEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 19/04/2024 PASSED BY THE LXXXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-85), ON IA NO. 11/2024 FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF IN COM. OS NO. 898/2022 WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-J, CONSEQUENTLY, ALLOW IA NO. 11/2024 WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-E AND PERMIT THE PETITIONER / PLAINTIFF TO FILE ITS REJOINDER WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-F, IN COM. OS 898/2022 PENDING ON THE FILES OF LXXXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-85). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING ON IAs. , THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed by the plaintiff under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 19. 04. 2024 passed on I. A. No. 11/2024 in Com. O. S. No.
898/2022 by the LXXXIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (for short, “the trial court”), whereby the application filed by the plaintiff under Order VIII Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, “CPC”) has been rejected. - 3 - WP No. 14305 of 2024 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the trial court. 3. The petitioner/plaintiff filed a suit in Com. O. S. No. 898/2022 for recovery of money and for a decree of perpetual injunction. Upon service of notice, the defendants appeared and filed their written statement. Thereafter, the plaintiff filed an application invoking the provisions of Order VIII Rule 9 of CPC, seeking permission to file a rejoinder to the written statement filed by the defendants. The said application came to be dismissed. Hence, the plaintiff is before this Court. 4.
The trial court, while dismissing the application, assigned the reason that since the defendants have not taken any defence of set-off for counterclaim, the plaintiff’s application for permission to file a rejoinder cannot be permitted. In fact, even though the defendants have not taken any defence of set-off for counterclaim in the written statement, the plaintiff can file a rejoinder with - 4 - WP No. 14305 of 2024 the leave of the Court. This aspect of the matter has not been considered by the trial court. On this short ground, the writ petition deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, the following order is passed: (i) The writ petition is allowed. (ii) The order dated 19. 04. 2024 passed on I. A. No. 11 in Com. O. S. No. 898/2022 by the LXXXIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, is set aside.
(iii) The trial court is directed to reconsider the application filed by the plaintiff under Order VIII Rule 9 of CPC, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, and in any event not later than 30. 06. 2026. (iv) The trial court is also directed to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible, preferably by the end of 2026, provided there is no order of stay of the said proceedings granted by any court of law. - 5 - WP No. 14305 of 2024 (v) Both parties are directed to cooperate for the speedy disposal of the suit. (vi) In view of the disposal of the main matter, all pending applications stand disposed of. Sd/- (H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE CM List No. : 1 Sl No. : 50
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.