RAMCHARAN YADAW AND OTHERS v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Chhattisgarh judgment dated 2020-11-26. RAMCHARAN YADAW AND OTHERS v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRCA No. 1169 of 2020 1. Ramcharan Yadaw S/o Shri Melaram Yadav Aged About 38 Years R/o Ward No. 3 Behind Dashara Ground Pithoura District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 2. Satish Agrawal S/o Shri Govind Ram Agarwal Aged About 39 Years R/ o Ward No. 4 Pithoura District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 3. Bantu @ Jyotish Agrawal S/o Shri Murlidhar Goyal Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Pithoura District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh (Wrongly Mentioned As Mantu Agarwal In The Fir Crime No. 145 Of 2019 Registered In P. S. Pithoura District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh), District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 4. Vinod Sinha S/o Shri Parasram Sinha, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Sarkada P. S. Pithoura District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 5. Bablu Sharma @ Nitish S/o Satish Sharma Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Ward No.
4 Pithoura District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 6. Gopal Pandey S/o Shri Chandarkant Pandey Aged About 32 Years R/ o Ward No. 15 Pithoura District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant Versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Pithoura, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ---- Non-Applicant MCRCA No. 573 of 2020 Ghanshyam Nayak S/o Ramlal Nayak Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Kusmura, Police Station Kotra Road, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. (Surname And Age Wrongly Mentioned In Annexure A/1), ---- Applicant Versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Kotra Road, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ---- Non-Applicant MCRCA No. 668 of 2020 Shiv Kumar Chaurasia S/o Ramdayal, Aged About 28 Years R/o Badkapara, Bartikalan, Police Station Basantpur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh.
, District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant Versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chouki Wadrafnagar, P. S. Basantpur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh ---- Non-Applicant MCRCA No. 710 of 2020 Neeraj Jagatramka S/o Late Shri Brajbhushan Jagatramka, Aged About 45 Years Occupation Business, R/o House No. 57, Vrindavan Colony, Bhagwanpur, Police Station Kotra Road, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh Phone No. 94252 51057, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant Versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station A J K Raigarh (City Kotwali, Raigarh) Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Non-Applicant MCRCA No. 792 of 2020 Shashank Sharma S/o Late Sunil Sharma Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Partra, Bemetara, Police Station And District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant Versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Mahasamund, (Ajak), District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ---- Non-Applicant MCRCA No. 903 of 2020 1.
Vijay Gupta S/o Late Ramlal Gupta Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Katima, Police Station Kusumi, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh 2. Hevanchand Gupta S/o Late Ramlal Gupta Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Katima, Police Station Kusumi, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh 3. Smt. Ritu Gupta W/o Jitendra Gupta Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Katima, Police Station Kusumi, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant Versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Karoundha, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh ---- Non-Applicant For Applicant : Shri RS Marhas, Shri Vivek Shrivastava, Shri VA Goverdhan on behalf of Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Shri Rohit Sharma and Shri Curtis Collins, Adv. For Non-Applicant :Shri Ayaz Naved, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 26/11/2020 MCRCA No. 903 of 2020 1.
Shri VA Goverdhan, appearing on behalf of Shri Manoj Paranjpe, advocates, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the bail application with liberty to prefer duly constituted Appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 2. Accordingly, the Application (MCRCA No. 903 of 2020) is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. Certified copy of the impugned order be returned to counsel for the applicant on retaining xerox copy thereof. MCRCA No. 1169 of 2020 3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the bail application with liberty to prefer duly constituted Appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 4. Accordingly, the Application (MCRCA No. 1169 of 2020) is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. MCRCA No. 573 of 2020 5.
Shri Rohit Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant would inform that the sole applicant has died during the pendency of the bail application rendering the bail application infructuous. 6. It is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. 7. List other bail applications viz. MCRCA Nos. 668/2020, 792/2020 and 710/2020 for consideration in the week after next. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Barve
Source: High Court of Chhattisgarh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.