LUCKY RYMBAI @ NASIB v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE W. DIENGDOH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2026-07-13. LUCKY RYMBAI @ NASIB v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 08 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl. M. C. No. 131 of 2026 Date of Decision: 13. 07. 2026 Shri Lucky Rymbai @ Nasib Aged about 45 years S/o Smti. Robina Rymbai R/o Moolamynnoh Village, East Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya. …Convict/Accused/Appellant -Versus- The State of Meghalaya Represented by Commissioner & Secretary Home Department (Police) Government of Meghalaya …Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Ms. D. D. Fancon, Legal Aid Counsel Ms. S. Chettri, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. H. Kharmih, Addl. P. P. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc. : ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No ORDER (ORAL) 1. Heard Ms. D. D. Fancon, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant who has submitted that the applicant has preferred an appeal against the impugned judgment and order of conviction dated 10. 08.
2023 and impugned order of sentence of even date passed by the learned Special Judge (POCSO), East Jaintia Hills District, Khliehriat in Special (POCSO) Case No. 6 of 2022 and in doing so, a delay of 1003 days has occurred while preferring the related appeal. 2. The learned Legal Aid Counsel has further submitted that the applicant has no means to file for appeal. Again, on receipt of the brief regarding the instant accused person by the learned Legal Aid Counsel the overall delay has cumulated to 1003 days in preferring the related appeal and therefore the applicant has come with this instant application for condonation of the same. 3. The learned Legal Aid Counsel prays that the delay may be condoned as the same is not deliberate or intentional. 4. Mr. H. Kharmih, learned Addl. P. P appears for the State respondent and has no objection to the prayer for condonation. 5.
On consideration of the prayer made, this Court is inclined to allow this application on being satisfied that the grounds cited contain sufficient cause. 6. Accordingly, the delay of 1003 days in preferring the related appeal is hereby condoned. 7. Registry to diarize the appeal and list the same for admission after 1(one) week. 8. Misc. Case disposed of. Judge Meghalaya 13. 07. 2026 “Tiprilynti–PS”
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.