Gulam Rasool Khan v. Sri S.Ujwala Reddy
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,PULLA KARTHIK
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-01-27. Gulam Rasool Khan v. Sri S.Ujwala Reddy. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK CONTEMPT CASE NO: 717 OF 2024 Contempt Case under Sections 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent herein for willfully violating the Order of the High Courtdated 16-2-2023 passed in W. P. No. 14865of 2017- Between: Gulam Rasool Khan, S/o. late Mohd. Afzal Khan, Aged about 73 years, Ex. Junior Assistant of A. P. Excise Dept. , Ranga Reddy District R/o. H. No- 1B-2-255lA/1, Jangammet,Falaknuma,Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER/RespondentNo. l AND 1. Sri S. Ujwala Reddy, Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Saoornagar, Ranga Reddy District 2. Sri P. Dashratha, Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Hyderabad Division, Hyderabad. 3. Sri E. Sridhar, Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Telangana, Hyderabad. 4.
Sri Sunil Sharma, (Special Chief Secretary to Govt. , Revenue (CT, Excise Dept. ) Prl. Secretary, Revenue (Excise)Department, State of Telangana, Seirdtariat, Hyderabad. .. Respondents/ Petitioners lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to release the pension and other pensionary benefits to which the Petitioner is legally entitled to by implementing the orders of the Hon'ble High Court in W. P. No. 14865 ot 2017, dated 16-2-2O23 - Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. P. SUDHEER RAO, REPRESENTING MS. K. UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SANTHAPUR SATYANARAYANA, GOVT. PLEADER FOR SERVICES -I The Court made the following ORDER: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE PULLA KARTIIIK C. C. No. 717 oF 2024 27. 01. 2026 Between: Gulam Rasool Khan . . . Petitioner AND S.
Ujwala Reddy, Prohibition and Excise Superintendent. Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District and 3 others ... Respondents l I I ORDER: (per Hon'ble Sri Jusrice p. Sam Koshy) I I I Heard Mr. p. Sudheer Rao, learned counsel i representing Ms. K. Udaya Sri, leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Santhapur Satyanarayana, leamed Government preader for Services-I for the respondents. perused the record. 2. Aggrieved of non-compliance of the order dated 16. 02. 2023 passed in W. P. No. 1486 5 of 2017 and also non_compliance of the order dated 20. 07. 2016 passed in O. A. No. l329 of 2013, the present contempt case has been filed. 3. It appears that the solitary relief which was granted by the Division Bench of this Court while dismissing the writ petition of the State was directing the respondents to release the pension and pensionary benefits to the employee concerned. 4.
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, it has been informed that the employee because ofage related issues has since passed away, though the pension and pensionary benefits were not released to the employee. It has also been informed that the employee was also not released the gratuity amount and other retirement amounts. 5. As regards the pension and pensionary benefits, since the employee is no rhore alive and it is informed that the spouse of the employee is also pie-deceased and only the two sors of the employee survive and as regards any monetary benefit that fell due and which can be passed on to the children like gratuity and other unpaid retiral benefits, we leave it open for the children to agitate the same independently before the respondent authorities and upon such claim being made, it is expected that the \.
respondents shall properly scrutinize the same and take an appropriate decision forthwith 6 So far as the present contempt case is concemed; in the light of the death of the deceased employee, we close the contempt case at this juncture with the aforesaid liberty to the legal heirs of the deceased employee and discharge the respondents fiom the contempt case. There shall be no order as to costs Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed i Sd/. P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA I DEPUTY REGISTRAR I I //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Smt. K. UDAYA SRl, ADVOCATE (opuc) 2. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES -l ,High Court for the State of Telangana lourl 3. Two CCs to GP for Services High Court for the State of Telangana at -lll, Hyderabad. 4, Two CD Copies kul/DL Yv HIGH COURT DATED:271O112O26 ORDER CC. No. 717 of 2024 CLOSING THE CONI'EMPT CASE *# % Y#
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.