Manda Ranjith v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: P.KESHAVA RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-04. Manda Ranjith v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA \ AT HYDERABAD '*''1[) u * JT. , Ei 3XIE ? ffi ? fi,pi? i,u PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P,KESHAVA RAO CRIMI N ALR EVIstoNC AS E NO: 46 0F 2019 Criminal Revision Case filed Under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr. p. C against the order made rv. c. No. 11g of 2016 dated 01 . 12. 20180n the fire of the court of the Judge, Famiry court-cum-* Additionar District Judge at Warangal. Between: lr/anda. Ranjith, S/o Ashok, €ged about 33 years, Occ. private Employee, R/o. H. No. 12-1-103. Pinnavari Stieet. Warangal. ' ... Petitione r/Responde nt AND 1. The State of Telangana, represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature of Telangana, at Hyderabad. ... 1 "t Respondenustate 2. lVlanda Manjula, W/o. Ran1ith, C/o. Vaikandla Krishna tVurthy, Aged about 26 years, Occ. Household, R/o. H. No. 1 1-21-60, Kashibugga, Warangal. ... 2nd RespondenUComplainant lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 482 Cr. P. C.
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including execution of Order of dated 1. 12. 2018 in Ir/C. No. 119 of 2016 on the of Judge, Family Court-cum-lll Additional District Judge, at Warangal, pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision Case. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A. PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (TG) Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: SRI R. JAYAPRAKASH The Court made the following: ORDER RA'O SRI JUSTICE P' KESHAVA THE HONOURABLE No. 46 of 2019 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE ORDER: submined letter, dated Learned counsel for the petitioner a stating that the petitiorrer 29. 11.
2020, belbre the Registrar'(Judicial) the issr"re seeks to rvithdraw the above criminal revision case, as involved in the crirninal revision case and other cases pending betbre the trial Courts are settled between the petitioner ancl his rvif'e Therefbre, he requests the matter to be posed under the caption 'tbr withdrawal' and he may be permitted to withdraw the criminal revlslon case. In view of the letter, dated 29. 11. 2020, filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the criminal revision case is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed Sd/. C. V. MALLIKARJUNA VARMA DEPUTY REG RAR //TRUE COPY' hz SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Judge, Family Court-cum-lll Additional District Judge, at Warangal. 2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 3. One CC to Sri A. Prabhakar Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri R. Jayapra kash,Advocate [OPUC] 5.
Two CD Copies Yrn Nr--- HIGH COURT PKRJ DATED:0411212020 (q 17DE}IW ORDER * l! CRLRC. No. 46 ot 2019 IiTC DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS WITHDRAWN ssrl ' ltpPraD q )f \r{,-=-
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.