SANDEEP KUMAR v. HRTC AND ANOTHER
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2020-03-13. SANDEEP KUMAR v. HRTC AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP Nos. 2217, 2194, 2195, 2197, 2221, 2317, 2434, 2450, 2451, 2452, 2454, 2484 and 2485 of 2019 th Decided on: 13 March, 2020 _______________________________________________________________ CWP No. 2217 of 2019 Hira Lal …... Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another ……Respondents _______________________________________________________________ CWP No. 2194 of 2019 Virender Sehgal …... Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another ……Respondents _______________________________________________________________ CWP No. 2195 of 2019 Saroj Kumari …... Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another ……Respondents _______________________________________________________________ CWP No. 2197 of 2019 Sarita Devi …... Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another ……Respondents _______________________________________________________________ CWP No.
2221 of 2019 Arjun Kumar …... Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another ……Respondents _______________________________________________________________ CWP No. 2317 of 2019 Anoop Kumar …... Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another ……Respondents _______________________________________________________________ CWP No. 2434 of 2019 Ashwani Kumar …... Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another ……Respondents _______________________________________________________________ CWP No. 2450 of 2019 Sandeep Kumar …... Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another ……Respondents _______________________________________________________________ CWP No. 2451 of 2019 Uma Devi …... Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another ……Respondents _______________________________________________________________ CWP No. 2452 of 2019 Sanjeev Kumar …...
Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another ……Respondents _______________________________________________________________ CWP No. 2454 of 2019 Rita Devi …... Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another ……Respondents _______________________________________________________________ CWP No. 2484 of 2019 Sunita Kumari …... Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another ……Respondents _______________________________________________________________ CWP No. 2485 of 2019 Rajeev Mahajan …... Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another ……Respondents _______________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. [ The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting?. No. For the petitioner(s): Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP No. 2217 of 2019 and Mr.
Vinay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s) in remaining CWPs. For the respondents: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the respective petitioners state 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? that the issue in question is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 1557- 1564 of 2019, titled as Himachal Road Transport Corporation Versus Lekh Ram etc. etc. , decided on February 08, 2019. Learned counsel for the respondents states that the Department has no objection in case the petitions are disposed of with a direction to consider the respective cases of the petitioners in the light of the aforesaid judgment. 2.
Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the respective cases of the petitioners in the light of judgment in Lekh Ram’s case (supra) and in case the same are covered, then all consequential steps in compliance to the aforesaid judgment be taken within a period eight weeks from today. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No order as to costs. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Anoop Chitkara) Judge March 13, 2020 (Himalvi/Atal)
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.