Kowdi Saiyanna Shashikala v. The state of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-01-07. Kowdi Saiyanna Shashikala v. The state of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[ 348e I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETI TION NO: 27267 OF 2025 Between: Kowdi Saivanna Shashikala, Wo B. Noel Milton, Age: 54 years' Occ: Govt Employee H. No. 112,' Gun Rock, Near Water Tank, Tirumalagiri, WC: Secunderabad, Hyderabad ... PETITIONER AND 1 ngana, Administration Principal Secretary, Law Department, The State of Tela Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Registrar (Administration), High Court of Te{angana' Hyderabad, Telangana. 3. The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District' Telangana. 4. P. Venkateshwar Goud, Sl/o Not known b the petitioner' Age. not known, Occ. Govt Emolovee Senior Superintendent Principal District arid Sessions Court, Medchal-MalkaigiriDistrict'Kushaiguda'Telangana ...
RESpoNDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the afFrdavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare that the action of Respondents 3 in granting promotion to Respondent ltlo. 4 to the post of Administrative Officer vide (Serial No. 8) in ROC No. 1366/2025 - C.
1 Dated: 04-09-2025 is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently set aside the said promotion as null and void, Direct the Respondents 'l to 3 to consider and promote the petitioner to the post of Administrative Officer, with all consequential service benefit; including fixation of seniority, pay, and allowances- lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the ci r umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court mE ) be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 to furnish a copy of the proceeditt, s bearing Dis. No. 301712025, dated 02-07 -2025, relating to the promotion of I lespondent No. 4, to the Petitioner forthwith, in the interest of justice and fair play.
lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci1 umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stayisuspend/keep in abeyance the proceedings of Respond: rt No. 4 in (serial No. 8) ROC 136612025. C-1, Dt. 04-09-2025, insofar as they rel€t : to the promotion of Respondent No. 4 to the post ', of Chief Administrative Offic€ and consequently direct the respondents not to confer any further service ber efits or seniority on Respondent No. 4. lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci r umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct the Respondents to promote the Petitioner to the post ol )hief Administrative Officer / Administrative Officer, as applicable, pending dispose of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. P. RADHIKA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP FOR SERVICES - ll Counsel for the Respondent No.
2 & 3: SRI MANOJ REDDY I :ESHI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: - The Court made the following: ORDER TN THE HTGTI COI-IR. T FORTIIE STATE OF TELANGANA AT I'DEIIABAD THE IIONOUiIAIILE SRI JTTSTICE P. SAM KOSHY Ai',it) TTIE HGNOLJTTAI}LE SI{I JUSTICE Stl DI);r LA CIIALAPA'IHI RAO \Yrit I'etition l\o. 27267 of 2025 Itated: 0'7. {11. 2026 B etween: KoivCi Saivanna Sh,,rsir rl. :ala ... Petitioner ,\ nd 'felangana The State of Adr;rinistration Principal Sccretilry' , l. '. : \' [)t]pati-lncfit, Secretariat. LI1'cier. :t . ,li ,i it. l :;l,lttl'':. Respondents (. t li D F. t{: ! ts. P. lLarih. i... , :- ! J'rr:ir. t. :rrrred coltnsel for the petitioller, pla1,s ltrr r. r ithd,. au r | , , ih; i. '; ri'. petition with liberty to revive the sairc iir case il tr-. e l:'it' . . rrice of :ire :-'etitioner still survives l. As pral,cd ilr ij-,e Yiri",i Petition stands dismissed as l ithdrervn rvith a ti r irr-i-.. : ntirrned iibrrty. There shall be no order as tii costs. ..
Conse<iuentl-y, r. iril;cr. :llarrr:i;. -l:, peiitiili . if any, shall irirnd. l-l stand closed Sd/ K. BHAVANI SWAMY ASS STANT REGISTRAR i <_-,- //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. One CC to Ms. P. RADHIKA SHARMA, Advocate :] IOPLI( 2. Two CCs to GP for Services-ll, High Court for the S tate of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3. One CC to SRI MANOJ REDDY KESHI REDDY, Advor; te [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies MP PMK 17 HIGH COURT DATI:D:0710112026 -':-,. O 1 r. l (j i i. Clr. * -<. -. ,:. , t. 'i ' ! ; i ,. ,ORDER WP. No. 27267 ot 2025 DISMISSING THE VII RIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WIT{OUT COSTS / ,L-) (-. t CE_ _1€ . u-d
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.