RAJKUMAR v. STATE
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2020-01-24. RAJKUMAR v. STATE. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 860/2020 Bheru Singh S/o Rai Singh Chundawat, aged about 40 years, By caste Rajput, Resident of Chouhano Ka Guda, Police Station Rajnagar, District Rajsamand. (At present lodged in District Jail, Rajsamand). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan ----Respondent Connected With S. B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 456/2020 Rajkumar S/o Shri Shankerlal, aged about 30 years, B/c Khatik, R/o Kumhariya Kheda, P. S. Nathdwara, at present Jalchakki Chauraha, Behind Verma Petrol Pump, Kankroli, P. S. Kankroli, Dist. Rajsamand. (At present lodged at District Jail, Rajsamand),. ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. S. Sisodia & Mr. Dilip Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, P. P. HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 24/01/2020 Both the above mentioned bail applications shall stand decided by this common order as they arise out of the same F. I. R. (2 of 3) [CRLMB-860/2020] The present bail applications have been filed under Section 439 of Cr. P. C. on behalf of the petitioners who are in custody in connection with F. I. R. No. 272/2018, Police Station Rajnagar, District Rajsamand for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 & 120-B of I. P. C. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the incident is related to the year 2014 and the petitioners have got loan of the complainant sanctioned from the bank. The material which was taken by the complainant from Rajkumar has also not been disputed. Learned counsel further submit that since the complainant could not repay the installments of the bank, he has resorted to lodge the present F. I. R.
Therefore, it is prayed that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that the bail applications filed by the petitioners deserve to be accepted. Consequently, both the bail applications under Section 439 of Cr. P. C. are allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners (1) Bheru Singh S/o Rai Singh Chundawat and (2) Rajkumar S/o Shankerlal arrested in connection with F. I. R. No. 272/2018, Police Station Rajnagar, District Rajsamand shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees : Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the (3 of 3) [CRLMB-860/2020] satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 30 & 31-Inder/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.