M/s. Balaji Estates India Private Limited v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-11-26. M/s. Balaji Estates India Private Limited v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
[ 3183 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 32167 OF 2024 Between: at 16-11-741lBlA2' M/s. Balaii Estates lndia Private Limited, having its office Dilsukhnagar' Flat No. ' 304, Subhodaya Residency, Moosarambagh, Hvderabad. Smt. Alla Nirmali Rep. bv its'Director D/o. A. Thirupathi Reddy, a{ed 58 years,H. No. 25l2RT,. saidabad Colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad - 500059. ... PETITIONER AND Department, 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Secretariat Building-s, BRKR eh-awan, Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. J The Station House Officer, S. R. Nagar Police Station, ...
RESPONDENTS praying in the Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia that therewith, the High court may be circumstances stated in the affidavit filed particularly one in the nature of pleased to issue a writ order, or direction more writ Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not taking any action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 07. 11. 2024, for taking action against the,illegal occupant of property belonging to the petitioner bearing House Nlo. l-'t-ZlUetZ, on Plot No. 8, comprising of Ground Floor, First Floor, Second Floor, Third Floor and Fourth Floor, admeuaring 320 Sq. yards, equivalent to 267. 52 Sq. meters, situated at Shiva Bagh, Ameerpet, Hydefabad, as highly 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia, apart illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article from violative of the law laid down by the Hon'ble supreme court of lndia in Lalitha Kumari. vs.
State of uttar Pradesh, consequently direct the respondent herein to forthwith register FIR against the accused, basing on the complaint of the petitioner dated 0z. t 1. 2024 in compliance with the guidelines laid down by the Hon,ble supreme court of lndia in Lalitha Kumari vs. state of Uttar Pradesh. IANO:1OF2 024 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, ine High cou,-t may o" p6rr. J t, direct the respondent herein to forthwith register FIR against the accused, basing -t on the complaint of the petitioner dated or. 11. 2024 in comprian"" wiin e guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble supreme court of lndia in Lalitha Kumari vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. JAYASIMHA REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents: ASST. Gp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER -v . , THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY -) WRIT PETITION 0.
32167 0l 2024 ORDER: of The writ petition is filed to declare the action the _ respondent No. 3 in not taking any action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 07. 11. 2024. as illegal and arbitrary. for Home, on the 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader basis of written instructions, submitted that on receipt of complaint from the petitioner, the respondent No. 3 made petition entry vide Petition ID. No. 3010 dated 07. 11. 2O24 and conducted enquiry' It was revealed in the enquiry that the petitioner purchased house bearing No. 7 -1--212/ Al3 on Plot No. 8 comprising of G+4 floors at I I Shiv Bagh, Ameerpet, Hyderabad, in the name of their company under registered sale deed bearing document No'1959/2016 dated 21. 04. 2016.
The property was occupied by one Gorantla Anil Babu and he is running Boys Hostel in the said premises' The dispute between the petitioner and the alleged respondent pertains to house property and is purely civit in nature' Except making allegations, the petitloner did not produce any evidence or witnesses in support of her' version that the alleged respondent threatened her with dire consequences. The complaint of the petitioner was closed as civil In nature on 21. 17 '2024 and the -J petitioner was informed about the same vide registerecl post on 27. 7L. 2024. 3. Copy of the written instructions along with the closure report is served on the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition and it is accordingly closed. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to invoke appropriate legal remedy if she is aggrieved by the closure report. r The miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
There shall be no order as to costs. SD/-B. CHANDRA PRAKASH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I/TRUE COPY/I s \ SECTION OFFICER \ To, 1 The Principal Secretary, Home Department, The State of Telangana, Secretariat Buildings, BRKR Bhawan, Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. J The Station House Officer, S. R. Nagar Police Station, Hyderabad, 4 One CC to SRI M. JAYASIMHA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 5 Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUTI o Two CD Copies BN BS CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED:2611112024 . t I si T. 1 1 iGi . a)e- + . f Z i,Li i11,1 . (_, ,i. -,2,. \.. '/ \\. : .. ;, . / ORDER '\: WP. No. 32167 of 2024 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS L} )DY4
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.