SRI MAHADEVASWAMY H R v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: S.G.PANDIT,K. V. ARAVIND
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-22. SRI MAHADEVASWAMY H R v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 16929 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ND DATED THIS THE 22 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. G. PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 16929 OF 2025 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: SRI MAHADEVASWAMY H. R. S/O. SRI RAJAPPA H. S. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS DATE OF BIRTH: 21. 05. 1985 PRESENTLY WORKING AS ASSISTANT TEACHER GOVERNMENT HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL KANENURU, NANJANAGUD TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT-571 314 ST TH R/AT NO. 209, 1 FLOOR, 4 CROSS ST KANDAYANAGAR, 1 STAGE, SRIRAMAPURA MYSURU DISTRICT-570 023 REPRESENTED BY THE COUNSEL SMT. THEJASAWINI B. M. ADVOCATE TH HOUSE NO. 13, 4 CROSS NARAYANAPPA LAYOUT DODDABALLAPUR TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561 203 MOBILE- 8217419896 MAIL: THEJUTHEJASWINIBM@GMAIL. COM …PETITIONER (BY SRI THEJASWINI B. M. , ADVOCATE, (ABSENT)) - 2 - WP No. 16929 of 2025 AND: 1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY ND TH 2 GATE, 6 FLOOR, M. S. BUILDING DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDI BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY NRUPATUNGA ROAD, SAMPANGIRAMANAGAR DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDI BENGALURU-560 001 3. THE DIRECTOR (PRIMARY EDUCATION) DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY NRUPATUNGA ROAD, SAMPANGIRAMANAGAR DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDI BENGALURU-560 001 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (DDPI) DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY OFFICE OF THE DDPI, NAZARBAD MYSURU DISTRICT MYSURU-570 001 5. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER (BEO) OFFICE OF THE BEO GADI CHOWKA SCHOOL CAMPUS NANJU MALIGE CIRCLE MYSURU-570 004 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V. SHIVAREDDY, A. G. A. ) - 3 - WP No. 16929 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL ORDER DATED 06. 01.
2025 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN O. A. NO. 4762/2024, IN SO FAR AS IT DECLINED TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE RELIEF OR BINDING DIRECTION IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER’S GRIEVANCE ARISING FROM COUNSELING IRREGULARITIES AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. G. PANDIT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. G. PANDIT) In the morning, at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter was passed over to comply the office objections. When the matter was called out at 3. 00 p. m. , there is no representation for the petitioner. th 2. The writ petition is listed for 5 time for compliance of office objections. The second set of writ petition is also not filed and office objections are not complied and cost, as ordered is also not paid. - 4 - WP No. 16929 of 2025 3.
In the above circumstances, there is no justification to grant further time for compliance of office objections. Hence, the writ petition stands rejected for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (S. G. PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE MPK CT:VC List No. : 2 Sl No. : 6
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.