Abdul Hakim v. State Of Manipur And 4 Others
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-02-19. Abdul Hakim v. State Of Manipur And 4 Others. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Digitally signed by JOHN JOHN TELEN KOM Date: 2024. 02. 20 TELEN KOM 19:10:25 +05'30' Item No. 49 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C)No. 31 of 2024 Md. Abdul Hakim …Petitioner - Versus - State of Manipur & 4 Ors. …Respondents BEFORE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA O R D E R 19. 02. 2024. [1] Heard Mr. I. Denning, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Y. Ashang, learned GA for the State respondents. [2] Mr. I. Denning, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was initially appointed as Book Man(Peon) at the Lilong Haoreibi College, Lilong, Manipur and he retired from his service on attaining the age of superannuation w. e. f. 29. 02. 2020 and his leave encashment amounting to Rs. 3,39,900/-(Rupees three lakhs thirty nine thousand and nine hundred) is yet to be released. [3] The petitioner has submitted a representation dated 04. 12.
2023 to the concerned authorities for releasing his leave encashment and the representation is still pending with the respondents. [4] By the present writ petition, the petitioner prays for directing the respondents to release his leave encashment amounting to Rs. 3,39,900/-(Rupees three lakhs thirty nine thousand and nine hundred) and also to dispose of the representation dated 04. 12. 2023 by speaking order. [5] It is submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 04. 12. 2023 by a speaking order. [6] Mr. Y. Ashang, learned GA submits that the representation dated 04. 12. 2023 may be disposed of by passing innocuous order by directing the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to dispose of the representation dated 04. 12. 2023 provided that this Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case.
[7] Recording the submission made at the Bar, the present writ petition is disposed of by directing respondents Nos. 1 to 3 to dispose of the representation dated 04. 12. 2023 submitted by the petitioner by a speaking order within a period of 3(three) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. [8] It is clarified that this Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case. [9] Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel appearing for the parties. JUDGE John Kom
Source: High Court of Manipur. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.