G. Sanjeeva v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-13. G. Sanjeeva v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3183 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 34512 OF 2024 Between: G. Sanjeeva, S/o. Late Lrngaiah Aged about 42 years Occ. Assistant plqgra_TTe1 D-ep-artment of ECE, CB|T, Gandipet Hydeiabad R/o H. No. 12-2_ 3718. 161, D, Asifnagar, Zebabagh, Hyderabarj ... PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep, by its principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate Gachibowli, Cyberabad, R. R. District 3. The Assistant commissioner of Police, cyberabad commissionerate Narsingi, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy district 4. The Station House officei, Narsingi p. S. Narsingi, Cyberabad Ranga Reddy diskict ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of wRlr oF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondent No. 4 in not registering a crime based on the complaint dated 2-9-2024 received by the 4th respondent on 3-9-2024 against the culprit is illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the provisions ot 173 of BNSS, 2023. and also contrary to the setfled principle of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 1sl cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to DIRECT the 4th respondent to register a crime against the named persons(. l) M. Shiva Reddy, Liaison Officer, (2) Ms. Anne Violet -HR (3) Dr. CV Narasimhulu Principal (4) Mr.
china Ramu Head Department of csE,5 Mr. vasanth Kishore HOD ECE and 6 Mr. KRK prasad project Engineer as per the complaint dated 2-9_ 2024 received by the 4th respondent dated 3-92024 forthwith pending disposar of the Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S HARSHEET REDDY LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER r. THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B, VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION wo. 34512 of 2O24 ORDER: The writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondent No. 4 in not registering a crime based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 02. 09. 2O24, as being illegal and arbitrary. 2. Learned Assistant Govern ment pleader for Home, ') 3. Learned Assistant Governnrent pleader for Home, on the ) basis of written instructions, submitted that pursuant to receipt of complaint of the petitioner, the respondent No. 4 made GD entry I and conducted enquiry.
On examination of the eyewitnesses, it was found that the petitioner is a non-teaching employee in CBIT College. Recently, some of the employees protested against the management of the college about their increments under the leadership of the petitioner and obstructed the college buses by sitting in front of the buses and raised slogans against the college management. As per the rules of the College, the petitioner was served with a copy of suspension asking for reply, but the petitioner once again argued with the management about his suspension. Thus, it is clearly an internal issued between the petitioner and the college management and there is no element of cdmlnal law involved warranting action and the complaint was closed as. action dropped'. l^\ 4. Copy of the FIR along with closure report is served on the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition and it is accordingly closed.
However, the petitioner is given liberty to invoke appropriate legal remedy, if he is aggrieved by the closure report. The miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ,) SHAMBA \ ctl-' NAG ABHU sD,-P' ctsrRle TRE oFFICER COPYII cTloN IITRUE ift1"i1i;#dJtrHE"":EBR:5#iJnv. *;":'"i%L''lJ"F]"' PsK. t,,A- BS HIGH COURT l BVR,J DATED:13112t2024 -- Sl l\l (: 3. E ORDER , rtB ? [25 0 3 o WP. No. 34512 of 2024 , t o P41 CLOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS l* 21 t L\ 6caa
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.