M/s. Raksha Constructions and Developers v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: A.ABHISHEK REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-07. M/s. Raksha Constructions and Developers v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original J urisdiction) IVONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 19595 OF 2019 Between: It//s. Raksha Constructions and Developers, represented by its managing partner Sri Kailas Srinivas, S/o. late Sri Sudhakar aged about 47 years, Occupation business, first floor, Sri Ganesh Residency 1-5-1083119711, Mangapuram Colony Phase - lll, Old Alwal, Secunderabad - 500010 .. ,PETITIONER AND 1 TheState of Telangana, represented by its Secretary, lVlunicipal Administration andU rban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Director of Town and Country Planning, Government of Telangana State, 3'd to 5'h floors, # 640, A. C. Guards, Opp. F. f t Building, Hyderabid -500 004. 3. The Commissioner, I\,4ancherial Municlpality, Mancherial. 4. Sri Yeshwanth, T. P. B. O. , office of the l\rlancherial lvlunicipality Near Water Tank, Mancherial -504 208. ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an Order, Direction or Writ and more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the acts of the respondents 3 and 4 in raising illegal objections on the application of the petitioner for grant of permission for construction vlde No. 3026/W'1i201913181, dated: 03-07-2019, in respect of land ad measuring 5,556. 33 square yards in Survey No. 318, situated at Mancherial, the action of the respondent No. 2 in not making enquiry on the complaint of the petitioner dated: 06-08- 2019 and not taking action against the respondent No. 4 as per law, as illegal, arbitrary, high handed, violative of principles of natural justice and the Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia, etc. and consequently direct the respondent No.
3 to grant and release construction permission to the petitioner for the said property in the given application and direct the respondent No. 2 to take necessary disciplinary action against the respondent No. 4 for his misdeeds, in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order directing the respondent no. 3 to release building construction permission to the petitioner in respect of property of iand ad measuring 5556. 33 square yards Survey No. 318, situated at N,4ancherial, on the application No. 3026/W 11201913181, dated: 3-07-2019, forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHYAM S. AGRAWAL Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1&2: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: SRI N.
PRAVEEN KUMAR Counsel forthe Respondent No. 4: SRI G. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 19595 of 2OL9 ORDER: Sri Shyam S. Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdras, the Writ Petition, and states that he has already liled a Memo uide USR No. 39212 of 2020, dated 20. 11 . 2O2O, in the Registn' to that effcct. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as u,ithdrau,n. The miscellaneous petitions pending, il an1', shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. K. AMMAJ ASSISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. Shyam S. Agrawal, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One C. C. to Sri. N. Praveen Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One C. C. to Sri. G. lvladhusudhan Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, High court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 5.
Two CD Copies Prk HIGH COURT DATED:0711212020 S;. c 1r\E I'{: 3- + J c t r) 09DECm l:) -L -\ a)F ,. -. o S l,ri't Ci ORDER WP. No. 19595 of 2019 Dismissing the WP. as withdrawn without costs. ? /O
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.