Dr. RaviKumar Reddy Matli v. Union of India
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-05. Dr. RaviKumar Reddy Matli v. Union of India. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
i I i i I i [ 3300 ] I I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA i t AT HYDERAAAD i (Special ! Original Jurisdiction) I THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER I TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITI ON NO:6 558 0F 2024 Between: 1. Dr. RaviKumar Reddv Mafli, S/o. M. Venkata Subba Reddy, age 34 years, occ-Doctor Ri/o. ptot ho. atio, Siirilrtf;it;y#, zno rrocir, Rt-,d i{6. 19: ' Ayappa society, Madhapur, Hyderabad -s000di. 2. Dr. Challa Kapil Karthik^eya Reddy, Sio Sri. C. Sreenivasulu, age 32 years, occ. doctor FJo. 224-33\ Leeia palace, 5th fine, na-rir;inii,-N6I";;: Andhrapradesh -524002 3. pr, pravin . Anlu. r.. Ssbhenival, , Sio. Sri. Kumar, aoe 41 years. occ. doctor R/o. H. No. B-Vlf/l, Mohafla Bawian. Kapurthata, priniSU _ ra+OOf 4. Dr. D. P. Kalyana Chakravarthi, S/o. Sri. Dunoa Krishna Murthv. aoe 39 years. Rl/o pelvaravanipeti. - . occ. student 1-1 Main Street iti<it"p"J"il. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh - S32005.
S p1 K S, D/o K_ A. Sreevitasan, age Q1 37 years. occ. student ^S1-eej! t[rg R/o. 238 Srinivasa Nitava, 8th Main, MEt t_ayoui, f-f"esaiagfitdM;i" i$#, Bangalore - 560073. ... PETITIONERS AND 1 of lndia, Represented . Union by its secretary Department of Health and Familv Ministry cif Heatth anri Famiiy Wetfire Y4t^":9, r[iiriin ahir';i, ri-",i, i*jrfr']"' 110011 2 State of Tcla. ng. qna, Represente_d_by principal its Secretary Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department Selretariat. Hyderabad. 3 Directorate of Medical Education, Govemment of Telangana Koti, Hyderabad, Represented by its Director. 4 National Medical Commission, Represented by its Chairperson Satarka - Bhawan, G. P. O. Comptex, BtockA, trun, ruewbeini oelht_ rrooze- 5 Nizam's lnstitute of Medical Sciences, punjagutta, Hyderabad _ 5000g2 Represented by its Dean. ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the constitution of rndia praying that in the -cJurt circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High may ue ---7/ , pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in ihe nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring and setting aside G. O. Ms. No. 165 of 2017 dated 06. 09. 2017 issued for compulsory Resident specialist postings for Super Speciality Post Graduates and the consecutive bonds issued by the respective Petitioners for a sum of Rs. 50,00,000/- and thereby withholding the respective Petitioners' original Degree certificates starting from SCC till super Speciality course Degree complelion certificates as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 19, 21 ,254 ofConstitution of lndia lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of G. O.
Ms. No. 165 ot 2017 dated 06. 09. 2017 in lieu of the observations by the Respondent No. 4 i. e. ; National Medical commission vide Letter bearing F. No. NMC/Secy-2O211191029791 dated 27. 1O. 2021 and consecutively direct the Respondents to forthwith release the original certificates of the Petitioners starting from SCC till Super Speciality course Degree completion certificates pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. SAMA SANDEEP REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No. l: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR Dy, SOLICITOR GEN. OF INDIA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 &3: GP FOR MEDICAL FAMILY AND WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent NO. 4: SRI GORANTLA SRI RANGA PUJITHA SC FOR NMC Counsel for the Respondent No. S: SRt G. ARUN KUMAR SC FOR NIMS The Court made the following: ORDER ,/ IION'BLT SRI JUSTICE NAGESII BHEEMAPAKA WRIT ON No.
6558 ot 2024 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of I I this I Court to withdraw the present writ I petition with libert5r to i j file fresh writ petition or to avail remedies i as available under i law. :2. Permissiort as sought for is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ petition is dismissed as urithdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. No costs. Miscellaleous applications, pending if any, shall stald closed' sD/-A. sRtNtvAS REDDY ASSI T NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S c OFFICER To, 1. One CCto SRl. SAMASANDEEP REDDYAdvocate IOPUCI \ Dv SOLICITOR GEN OF INDIA 2. One CC to SRl. GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR loPUCl 3. One CCto SRI GORANTLA SRI RANGA PUJITHA SC FoR NMC {OPUCI 4. OneCC to SRI G. ARUN KUMAR SC FOR NIMS [OPUC] 5. TwoCCstoGPFoRMED|CALFAM|LYANDWELFARE,HighCourtforthe State of Telangana at Hyderabad. {OUfl 6. Two CD Copies KKS BSK w-i I \ HIGH COURT DATED:0511212024 jtrl e )' ( I t > J Itffi 2 l a L) . L t t o oE ORDER of 2024 WP. No.
6558 i I I l i WRIT PETITION DISMISSING THE AS WITHDRAWN COSTS WITHOUT
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.