AVANTI FEEDS LTD., v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-01-06. AVANTI FEEDS LTD., v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
', 348e [ ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY AND CHALAPATHI RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA INCOME TAX TRIBU NAL APPEAL NO: 56 OF 2011 lncome tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-,4 of the lncome tax Act' 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench B, Hyderabad in MA NO 198/HYD/2010 (in ITA No. 1360/HYD/2008) for Assessment year 2oo1-02 dated 12-11-2010, preferred against the order passed by the commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeal-ll), Hyderabad in ITA No. 0065/ClT(A)/04 05, preferred against the Assessment order dt 2610312004 in GIR/PAN : AABCA7365E, passed by Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax Circle 1(1), Hycjerabad' Between: Avanti Feeds LTD. ,, G 2, Concorde Apartments, 6-3-658, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. ... Appellant AND Commissioner Of lncome Tax, Hyderabad-1 , lT Towers, 10-2-3, A C Guards' Hyderabad. I ...
Responde nt I Counsel for the Appellant(s): None appeared i I I Counsel for the Respondents: BOKARO SAPNA REDDY (SENIOR SC INCOME TAX) t I . : The Court made the following: JUDGMENT . eli"*i ':. : -7 IJONOU IIT\Ul,! l S R I . l tiS'l'l(' E I,. SAM K() : t Y ANI) IION'BLI. - SRI . 'US ICI] SUDDAI,A CHAI,AI'\' III RAO l-l TA N0. 56 of 201 t l)a 1c:{)6. i1I . 202(r Iletu'ccn: Ar anti I cetls I id - []i d. :nrl,ati Appellant ,\ rrii ( otnrttissiortel ol lrrior--re i lrr- Ilrile i:1,:rrl Rcspondcnt . ltirXti\tEN'I: r l,Lt I lrttt . t,i. \t i . )tt. tu, r' l' . \rritt KLt:ltt t ! 1s. 1). Sirprrlr [{cdth. lcalrrctl \cr,ior Stltnrling ('otu. ,s: Ibr Income Tax [)cprtrtrtrcnt. apltelrrs (itr- h. rispoirtii.. ;rl. l. lltcrc is no t'al)t c:,Jitiirli()n ()l i)rjlrilll- t,l'rlre appclltrr t todar'. inspitc ol lc[,eetr'(l calls. A l. crrrs;il L i tlt,. 'plr',,-,:,r. r. ir_gs \ila(]i \vould sir r r thirt e. ,en in thc past coUple of uccrrsions.
llrL r'c is no represcnriltion on bchrril' rlthc appcllant. -1. lrt vicu ot'litc :lrr,r.. liriq iji;rr lr is icfi rvith no cl rcr option but to disniiss tlre appcal l,rr \\iLrl ()l pl-(rsu. t,lt(lit. 4. Accordinch. thc r\prtcal . -t ,itrl,r tlisrtrissed {br u irt t ol prosecution. No costs. l)crtding ntirtr-'llalteoirs applierrliorts. i1'anr. sIall stzlt ( ,jloscd SD/- A. S. S. C. S. M SARMA '/ I(fINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ;ECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench E, llyderabad 2 The Commisssioner of lncome Tax(Appeal ll), Hyderahrz r jerabad. 3 The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 1(1), Hy =ry PRASAD Advocate IOPUC] 4 One CC to SRI t\il V RAMACHANDRA (SENIOR SC INCOIV1E SAPNA REDDY 5 One CC tO SRI BOKARO I TAX) Advocate [OPUC] 6 Two CD CoPies Svsil'SL w I I I i ! I HIGH COURT DATED:0610112026 t I \ i I I I I I I t 1 h1E () 1 i tJ liB I t: i] () JUDGMENT . A .. ) * *,. , . o ITTA-No. 56 of 2011 .? ' C D,1TC - .
lr DISMISSING THE ITTA FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION oP'-g' <{G"
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.