Vivekavardhini Educational Society v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.LAKSHMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-09-10. Vivekavardhini Educational Society v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
[ 3168 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDARABAD (Special Original J urisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 26837 OF 2025 Between: 1. Vivekavardhini Educational Society, (Regd. No. 1628184), Premnagar, Mulugu village and Mandal, Mulugu District Rep. by its Secretary Sri Jalagam Mohan Rao, S/o Veeraiah, aged about 58 years, Rl/o [\4ulugu village and Mandal, Warangal District. 2. Vivekavardhini Gurukula Vidyalayam (High School), Premnagar, [VIulugu village and Mandal, lt/lulugu District Rep. by its Secretary-cum-Correspondent Sri Jalagam ltrlohan Rao, S/o. Veeraiah. aged about 58 years, R/o f\rlulugu village and Mandal, Warangal District ... PEflTrONER(s) AND 1. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration (CCLA), Telangana, Hyderabad. 3.
The District Collector, Warangal District 4. The District Educatlonal Officer, [r,4ulugu District. 5. The Joint Collector, lvlulugu District. 6. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mulugu, Mulugu District. 7. The Tahsildar, Mulugu [tlandal, lvlulugu District. ,.. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the continued inaction of Respondent No. 1 in not considering and disposing of the petitioner's representation dated 08. 04. 2013, despite the specific directions of this Hon'ble Court in W. P. No. 8348 of 2013 dated 03. 04. 2013, for regularisation/alienation of Ac. 4. 03 gts of land in Sy. Nos. 837/39 (Ac. 1. 08 gts), 837/30 (Ac. 1. 10 gts), 837/25 aGli. iralL*4,.. r* (Ac 1. 05 gts), and 837124 (Ac. O.
20 gts) of Mulugu Village and [/andal; percent Warangal District, as arbitrary, illegal and u nconstitutional, and consequently direct Respondent No. 1 to forthwith consider and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation dated 08. 04. 2013 for reg u la risatio n/alienation of the subject land. strictly in accordance with law and in terms of the recommendations of Respondent Nos. 3,6 & 7, and pending such consideration, direct the Respondents to maintain status quo with respect to the petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the school premises and ensure conlinuance of the school without obstructron. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 '1 Petition under Section 5'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct Respondent No. 1 to forthwith consider and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation dated 08. 04.
2013 for regu la risationi a Iiena tion of the subject land, strictly in accordance with law and in terms of the recommendations of Respondent No's. 3, 6 and 7, and pending such consideration, direct the Respondents to maintain status quo with respect to the petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the school premises and ensure continuance of the school without obstruction, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. A CHANDRAVATHI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent's No's 1 TO 3 & 5 TO 7: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER I a a I I '$: a I R K. LAKSHMAN HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE F 2025 ON No. 2 6837 0 WRIT PETITI ORAL ORDER: petitioners and for the Heard learned counsel for Ieamed Assistant Government Pleader Mr. L. Ravinder, Revenue. of vide filed a writ petition W'P'No'8348 2.
Petitioners have 16'01'2013 of the District 2013 to declare the proceedings dated this dated as illegal' Vide otder 03'04'2013' Collector, Warangal, that if the writ petition holding of the said Court disposed afresh to permitted to submit a representation petitioners are respondent No. 1 within ten days from the said date seeking within six respondent No'l shall' allotment of the subject land, the receipt of the representation, consider weeks from the date of with law' allotment of land' in accordance petitioners' request for and including the order of the Division Bench in W'P'Nos'1939 by Till orders are passed dated 24'08'2012' 16700 of 2009, quo as on the petitioners' representation' status respondent No. l t I a I on that date shall be maintained. However, it is made clear that if petitioners did not submit the representation within ten days, it is open to the respondents to take action, in accordance with law.
With the above observations, this Court disposed of the said writ petition. 3. It is the specific contention of the petitioners that they have submitted representation on 0g. 04. 2013 to respondent No. l in compliance with the said order. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said representation, respondent No. r did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent No. l, petitioners filed the present writ petition. 4. Learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue has produced the written instructions of respondent No. 7, wherein it was stated that respondent No. 7 is not aware of the said representation dated 0g. 04. 2013 submitted by the petitioners to respondent No. l and he has not received any instructions from respondent No. l. The said written instructions are placed on record. J of 2013 was 5. Though the aforesaid order in W'P'No'8348 submit granting liberty to the petitioners to passed on 03. 04.
2013 petitioners the date of order' within ten days from representation and there is a on 08'04'2013 the representation I have submitted \ There is no delay 12 years in pursuing the representation' of for the said plausible explanation much less the explanation, No'l to consider respondent However, it is for abnormal delay. in accordance pass appropriate orders the said representation and this Court in order issued by also the directions with law and of 2013' in W'P'No'8348 dated 03. 04. 2013 is this Writ Petition light of the said discussion' 6.
In the the No'i to consider resPondent of directing disposed and by the petitioners 08'04'2013 submitted representation dated He shall with law' orders in accordance pass appropriate (30) days from the date entire exercise within thirty complete the case' In the circumstances of the copy of order' of receipt of a this no order as to costs' there shall be i a As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ petition shall stand closed. SD/. K. BHAVANI SWAMY ANT REGISTRAR I i/TRUE COPYII I I CTION OFFICER 'J To, rep bv its principar J::,:,:lBi'-l? :ttT. 1 Secretary, Revenue Departmenr, 2 The Chief Commissioner of - - Land Administration Hyderabad. (ccLA), Telangana, The District Collector, Warangat District 4 The District Educational Officer, Mulugu District. The Joint Collector. IVulugu District. 6. The Revenue Divisional 'rcer, Off. [\4ulugu, l\ilulugu District. 7. The Tahsildar, t\rlulugu Mandal, I\4ulugu District. 8. One CC to SRt.
A CHANDRAVATHT REDDy Advocate [OpUC] o to GP FoR REVENUE ,High court for the stare t'#,ia? tt of retansana 10. Two CCs to GP FOR EDUCATION ,High Court for the State lourl of Telangana. 11. Two CD Copies *J a a I HIGH COURT DATED:10/09/202s IhE ii /4 /'€ t ORDER J ,J 2t trP ffi WP. No. 26837 C of 2O2S \\ . \ *l* * * FA tl e o I WRIT PETITION IS DISPOSED OF WITHOUT COST a o\ '' *, ,l q
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.