Danda Venkateswar Reddy v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: P NAVEEN RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-16. Danda Venkateswar Reddy v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO wRtT PET|T|ON NO. 22784 0F 2020 Between: Danda Venkateswar Reddy, S/o. Pitchi Reddy, Age 45 Years, Occ: Service, Ri/o. H. No. 3-Sl2lDl3, Bharath Nagar, Ramanthaour, Hyderabad, TS. ... PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Co-Operative Societies, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, TS. 2. Nalgonda District Central Co-Operative Bank, Rep by its Manager, Ramannapet Branch, Yadadri Bhongir District, TS. ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 o'f the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of l\/andamus declare the action of the 2nd Respondent is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law for granting the crop loan as per the representation filed in register post on 19. 11. 2020 and consequently set aside the 2nd Respondent to grant the crop loan to the Petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to consider the representation filed by the Petition on. 19. 1 1 . 2020 in register post. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MULLANGI RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: ORDER . ) HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.
NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 22784 of 2O2O ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Cooperation. With the consent of both counsel, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. 2. This writ petition is filed alleging that the application submitted by the petitioner on 19. Il. 2O2O to the 2"d respondent to grant crop loan is not processed so far. 3. There is no material on record to establish that petitioner is entitled to secure crop loan and the 2'd respondent is mandated to grant crop loan. Thus, no mandamus can be issued at this stage. 4. Thus, granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue the application already submitted by him to the 2nd respondent, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed. SD/-K,SAIL SHI ASSISTANT RE RAR //TRUE COPY// SECT N OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri lvlullangi Rami Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 2.
Two CCs to GP for Co-operation, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI 3. Two CD Copies. MP A',r- HIGH COURT DATED:1 611212020 STAr€ 1 o ? {[, Dt-C Z4 o i7 ORDER * Dg3p,'- *V WP. No. 22784 ot 2020 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ssV . copr ef ! -)- )e\t,t". ,-'a
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.