Konka Goutham Raju v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: T.VINOD KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-21. Konka Goutham Raju v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6316 OF 2020 Between: 1. Konka Goutham Raju, S/o Ramesh, 2. Konka Ramesh, S/o Shiva Ramulu, 3. Konka Bhavani, W/o Ramesh, ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 1 TO 3 AND 1. The State of Telangana, through Station House Officer of Tandur Police Station, Vikarabad District rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana. 2. Smt Vadde Konka Pravalika, @ Wio Goutham Raju, Fyo. H. No. 2-2-26012, Shanthinagar, Tandur Town, Vikarabad District. ... RES,ONDENTS Petition under Seclion 482 of Cr. P. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the [t4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C. C. No. 176 of 2020 on the file of Judicial [,4agistrate of F irst Class, Tandur, Vikarabad. LA. NO: 1OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 ot Cr. P.
C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C. C. No. 176 of 2020 on the file of Judicial lVagistrate of First Class, Tandur, Vikarabad District including personal appearance of the Petitioners. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P'GlRl KRISHNA, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITI ON Nos. 6316 of 2O2O ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 ol the Code ol Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'the Cr. P. C. '), seeking to quash the C. C. No. 1.
76 of 2020 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Tandur, Vikarabad District, taken cognizance pursuant to the charge sheet/final report bascd on Crime No. 174 of 2019 dated \5,O7 . 2O19 for the offences punishable under Sections 498-4, 384, 386, and 323 read with 34 IPC. 2. This Criminal Petition is taken up for hearing today, i. e. 2l . 12. 2O2O, through video conferencing. \ 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned i Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the 1st respondent State. With the consent of both the parties, the above case is taken up for hearing and disposal. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner, after making the initial submissions sccking to quash the C. C. No. 176 of 2O2O, however, subrnits that he is restricting the relief being sought lor the Court from granting exemption to the petitioners from appearance in thc above C. C. before the Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Tandur. 5.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the other hand would submit that based on the complaint made by the 2"d respondent/ defacto-complainant against the petitioner herein, the respondent authorities have registered a case in Crime No. 174 of 2019 and upon conducting investigation thereinto . have filed charge sheet in the above C. C. and the matter is pending consideration before the trial Court. 6. Having regard to the submissions made as above, and also taking note of the fact that the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are father and mother of the 1"t petitioner, the appearance of the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 in the above case can be dispensed with by permitting the 1"t petitioner to represent for himself and the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3/accused Nos. 2 and 3 in the above C. C. before the trial Court. I-{owever, the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 shal1 appear before the Court as and when required by the trial Court. 7. Subject to the above direction, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-[/. IVANJULA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' u: ltJIY,' SEcTroN oFfr0ER To 1. The Judicial First Class lvlagistrate, Tandur, Vikarabad District. 2. The Station House Officer, Tandur Police Station, Vikarabad District. 3. One CC to Sri P. Giri Krishna, Advocate (OPUC) 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor (TG), High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad (OUT) 5. Two CD Copies Kj N{/ HIGH COURT DATED:21 11212020 1 H e IF e lr o I 0 DEC 20?. 0 L) o * * c{: \ P ORDER CRLP. No. 6316 of 2020 Disposing the Crl. P. '... J -1GQi'i )r 3g\rz r
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.