Skip to main content
LawSphereX

M/S. PIONEER CARBIDE PVT. LTD. AND ANR. v. MEGHALAYA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND 3 ORS.

Court: High Court of Meghalaya

Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE I. P. MUKERJI, CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE W. DIENGDOH

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2025-09-03. M/S. PIONEER CARBIDE PVT. LTD. AND ANR. v. MEGHALAYA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND 3 ORS....

Judgment text

Serial No. 01 HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA Daily List AT SHILLONG MC(WA) No. 84 of 2025 Date of order: 03. 09. 2025 1. M/S Pioneer Carbide Pvt. Ltd, through its authorised representative Mr. Utkarsh Agarwal, Executive Director, Upper Baliyan, Umtru Road, Byrnihat- 793101, Meghalaya. 2. Maithan Alloys Ltd. , through its authorised representative Mr. Prasanna Kumar Misra, A-6, EPIP, Rajabagan, Byrnihat, District Ri-Bhoi, Meghalaya- 793101 ….. Applicants Vs 1. Meghalaya State Electricity Regulatory Commission, New st Administrative Building, 1 Floor, Left Wing, Lower Lachumiere, Shillong- 793001, Meghalaya. 2. The Secretary, Meghalaya State Electricity Regulatory st Commission, New Administrative Building, 1 Floor, Left Wing, Lower Lachumiere, Shillong- 793001, Meghalaya. 3. The Director, Meghalaya Power Generation Corporation Limited, Lumjingshai Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 4.

The Director Meghalaya Power Transmission Corporation Limited, Lumjingshai Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. ….. Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice I. P. Mukerji, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Appearance: For the Appellants : Mr. K. Paul, Sr. Adv with Mr. S. Chanda, Adv. Mr. B. Snaitang, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. S. Venkatesh, Adv. with Mr. A. Nigotia, Adv Ms. G. C. Marboh, Adv. for R/ 1 & 2 Mr. A. S. Pandey, GA. , with Mrs. S. Laloo, GA. for R/ 3, 4 & 5 We have considered the submissions of Mr K Paul, learned Senior Advocate and Mr Pandey, learned Advocate appearing for their respective parties. First of all, we make it absolutely clear that by our order dated st th 1 September, 2025, we have not modified our earlier order dated 12 st August, 2025.

As far as direction (d) “the arrear for the period of 1 rd April, 2024 till 23 October, 2024 if not paid would be paid by the st appellants by 30th September, 2025” in the order dated 1 September, 2025, is concerned, we clarify that the reference to “arrear” shall mean st the arrear which has fallen due for payment for the period 1 April, rd st 2024 till 23 October, 2024, as on the date of the said order i. e. 1 September. 2025. All payments will abide by the subsisting orders of this Court read with the directions of the Commission. Further, the word “Commission” at page 5 of the said Order shall be substituted by the “respondent Nos. 2 to 4. ” This application is accordingly disposed of. (W. Diengdoh) (I. P. Mukerji) Judge Chief Justice Meghalaya 03. 09. 2025 “Khraw”

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.