LawSphereX

G.Sailaja Kumari v. The State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: K. SARATH

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-02-12. G.Sailaja Kumari v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[ 33021 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 38203 OF 2025 Between: G. Sailaja Kumari, D/o. Kantha Rao, Aged about 41 Years, School Assistant (Maths), ZPHS Yenkathala, Mominpet Mandal, Vikarabad District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary' School Education Depai'tment, Secretariat Buiidings, Hyderabad-500 022 2 The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Saifabad' Hyderabad. 3 The District Collector. Vikarabad District. 4 The District Educational Officer, Vikarabad District. ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an approprlate Writ, Order of direction, preferably one in the nature of writ of Mandamus and to declare the in action of the respondents are not passing final orders on the representation of the petitioner dt 30-'10-2025 which is pending before the 1st respondent for not consrdering the case of the petitioner for seniority from the date of 28-12-2012 instead of 21-11-2013 on par with her batchmates who those were given appointments in the category of School Assistant (Maths) in Vikarabad District, the said action of the respondents is as highly illegal arbitrary, unreasonable, discriminatory and also in violation of principles of natural justice and also in violation of Art.

14, 1 6 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and declare the same as bad-in-law and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for fixation of seniority along with her batch mates of DSC-2012 as perthe G. O. Ms. No. 161, E:ducation Ser (Vl) Department, Da|ed 06-12-2008 in the category of School l\ssistant (lVaths) rn Vikarabad District by following the Division bench Judgmenls of this Hon'ble Court in W. P. Nos. 21193 of 2O17, dt. 29-6-2017,W. P. No. 4918 of 01 z, dt. 25-1 1-2022. W. P. Nos. 14941 of 2O14, dt. 13-07-2022 and W. P. No. 40461 : 2022, dt. 03-11-2022 by following the Apex Court Judgments in (1) Surendra l,l rra1,3n3 Vs State of Bihar (2) Balwanth Srngh Narwala and others Vs. State of l'1 rryana and others by passing final orders on the detailed representation dt. \O-10-2025 which rs pending with l st respondent.

lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci lumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition; the High Court rn: I be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for f xe icn of seniority along with her batch mates of DSC-2012 as per the G. O. tVls. No 1( 1, E:ducatron Ser (Vl) Department, Dated 06-12-2008 in the category of Schocl l\ssistant (l\,4aths) rn Vikarabad District by following the Division bench Judgmen I of this Hon'ble Cou( in W. P. Nos, 21193 of 2017, d|. 29-6-2017, W. P. No. 4918 o1 ,_r)17, dt. 25-11-2022, W,P. Nos 14941 of 2014, dt 13-07-2022 and W. P. No. 4Or(1 cf 2022. dt. 03-11- 2022 by following the Apex Court Judgments in (1) Surencr I Narayana Vs. State of Bihar (2) Balwanth Singh Narwala & others Vs. State ot l-laryana & others by passing final orders on the detailed representation dt. \a-'0-2025 which is pending with 1st respondent, pending disposal of the above yrit petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C. RAJA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR SERVICES - I The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDDRABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH W. P. No. 382O3 of 2o25 Datezl2. O2. 2o26 Between: G. Sailaja Kumari. ... Petitioner. And The State of Telalgana and others. ... Respondents ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-l lor the respondents. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is questioning the action of the respondent No. 1 in not passing the final order on the representation dated 30. 1O. 2O25 to consider her case for seniority from the date 28. 12. 2OI2 in stead of 27. 17. 2013 on par with her batch mates who were given appointments in the category of School Assistant (Maths) in Vikarabad District and requested to dispose of the writ petition by directing the l SK, J - \l . of 2025 '. Nc.

38203 and respondent No. 1 to consider the said repr(r ;entation pass appropriate orders. g. Crovernment On thc other hand, learned Assista. l- No' will Pleader for Services-I submits that the respo: clent 1 petitioner darr :lO. lO'2025 consider the representation of <l in due course and pass appropriate orders tr accordance with law Petition is In view ol the said submissions, the 'Vrit 4 No L to consider disposed of by directing the respondent dated 30. 10 I 025 and pass the representation ol petitioner lav' twelve appropriate orders in accordance with '"rdthin (12) weeks from the clate of receipt of copy o' this order and as to communicate the same to the pelitioner. ) () 'crder costs. if any pencl rLg in this Writ 5 l\4iscellaneous petitions, Petition, sha1l stand closed. SD/. A. II S. GOWRI SHANKAR ASi: ;ISTANT REGISTRAR <:i' i i/TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Principal Secretary, School Education Departmer t, S;tate of Telangana, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad-500 022.

2. One CC to SRI C. RAJA SEKHAR REDDY, Advocate [ )PUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Services-|, High Court for the itate of Telangana at \ Hyderabad [OUT] 4. Two CD CoPies N/IP w HIGH COURT SK,J DAI- lD:1210212026 r , iI (o*t;u i\ a_) ,it " r rl I l * ! s. ,, '-.. -:- ORDER WP. N<r 38203 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE \I IRIT PETITION WI.. HOUT COSTS rk a\ 2P

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.