Sri Mithan Das v. THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND 3 OTHERS
Court: High Court of Tripura
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2024-03-15. Sri Mithan Das v. THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND 3 OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) NO. 199 of 2024 Sri Mithan Das Vs. The State of Tripura and ors. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD Present: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramprasad Gope, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. R. Chakraborty, Advocate. 15. 03. 2024 Order This present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:- “I. Issue notice upon the Respondents. II. Call for the Records. III. Issue rule calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the past service rendered by the Petitioner as Graduate Teacher (Elementary Level) followed by service of Graduate Teacher (Secondary Level) under the Respondents shall not be counted in the present service for all purposes.
AND Issue Rule calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why the Petitioner shall not be granted all benefits of past service rendered as Graduate Teacher (Elementary Level) and Graduate Teacher (Secondary Level) for all purposes including pension, gratuity, Leave at credit, Pay Protection, Counting of the said period for the purpose of determining 5 years fixed pay period, etc. IV. And after hearing the parties, be pleased to make the rule absolute. AND/OR Pass any other order/orders as deemed fit and proper by this Hon'ble Court. ” It is seen from the record that the petitioner canvassing his grievance submitted a representation dated 01. 03. 2024 before the respondents i. e. the Director of Secondary Education, Directorate of Secondary Education, School Education Department, Government of Tripura and the Director of Elementary Education, Directorate of Elementary Education, School Education Department, Government of Tripura i. e. , respondents No.
2 and 3 through his engaged counsel enclosing all documents. But the same is pending till date. Accordingly, within going into the merit of the case, this present writ petition is disposed of with a direction upon the respondents to consider the representation dated 01. 03. 2024 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of 3(three) months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. Any such decision taken shall be communicated by the respondents to the petitioner herein. With the above observation and direction, this present writ petition stands disposed of. Stay if any stands vacated. Pending application(s), if any also stands closed. JUDGE suhanjit Digitally signed by RAJKUMAR RAJKUMAR SUHANJIT SUHANJIT SINGHA Date: 2024. 03. 18 SINGHA 16:40:13 +05'30'
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.