PREMO KHAKOLARY @ KHAKLARY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-09-17. PREMO KHAKOLARY @ KHAKLARY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC010106862020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C) 3137/2020 1:PREMO KHAKOLARY @ KHAKLARY S/O- LT. MOLIN KHAKOLARY @ MILAN KHAKLARY, R/O- VILL- HAZARI GAON, P. O. AND P. S. BARPATHAR, DIST. - GOLAGHAT, ASSAM, PIN- 785602 VERSUS 1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPTT. OF POWER, DISPUR, GHY-06, ASSAM 2:THE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN BIJULI BHAWAN PALTANBAZAR GHY-01 3:ASSTT. GENERAL MANAGER GOLAGHAT ELECTRICAL DIVISION APDCL GOLAGHAT PIN- 785621 4:SUB-DIVISIONAL ENGINEER GOLAGHAT ELECTRICAL SUB-DIVISION-1 APDCL GOLAGHAT PIN- 78562 Page No. # 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER 17. 09. 2020 Heard Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel for the writ petitioner. Also heard Ms. R.
Deka, learned Standing Counsel, APDCL, who submits that the order of termination of service of the petitioner has been revoked and order of his reinstatement in service has also been passed by the authorities on 16. 09. 2020. Therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. Mr. M. Dutta submits that his client has not yet been served with any copy of the order dated 16. 09. 2020. Be that as it may, if the order of termination has been revoked, then obviously the petitioner would be entitled to immediate reinstatement as well as a copy of the order of reinstatement. Ms. Deka submits that the copy of the order would be furnished to the petitioner within three days from today. In view of the above, the present writ petition has become infructuous. It is, however, made clear that reinstatement of the petitioner will not come in the way of the authorities in initiating fresh proceeding against him after compliance of principles of natural justice, if so advised. Page No.
# 3/3 With the above observation, this writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.