HARPAL SINGH AND OTHERS. v. RAHHUL YADAV AND ANOTHER.
Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2024-12-23. HARPAL SINGH AND OTHERS. v. RAHHUL YADAV AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
S. No. 34 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- CCP(D) No. 40/2024 1. Harpal Singh, age 44 years S/o Jagjit Singh, 2. Sunbir Kour, age 47 years, D/o Jagjit Singh, 3. Manmohan Kour, Age 77 years W/o Jagjit Singh, All R/o 488-A, Gandhi Nagar, Jammu ….. Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. S K Bhat, Advocate Vs 1. Rahul Yadav, Municipal Commissioner, JMC, Jammu 2. Smt. Rimpy Ohri, Joint Commissioner (Adm), (BOCA), Jammu Municipal Corporation, Jammu . …. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Rajnish Raina, Advocate HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE ORDER (23. 12. 2024) 01. This is the petition for initiating contempt proceedings for willful disobedience and non-compliance of the judgment dated 27. 03. 2024 passed by this Court in CCP(D) No. 9/2023 titled “Harpal Singh & Ors vs Rahul Yadav & Anr”, whereby the respondents were directed to treat the application of the petitioners as representation and decide the same within two weeks. 02.
Mr. Rajnish Raina, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that in compliance to the judgment, the respondents have considered the representation of the petitioners afresh and have passed a speaking order vide Order No. 155 of 2024 dated 23. 11. 2024, whereby the claim of the 2 CCP(D) No. 40/2024 petitioners has been found devoid of any merit and rejected. 03. In view of the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for the respondents and a copy of the government speaking order placed on record, the judgment passed by this Court stands complied with. There remains nothing for adjudication in this contempt petition. The contempt petition is, therefore, dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to work out their remedy against the speaking order in accordance with law. (PUNEET GUPTA) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE JUDGE JAMMU 23. 12. 2024 Vijay Vijay Kumar 2024. 12. 24 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.