BRANCH MANAGER, HDFC BANK LTD. v. SIMA BHATTACHARJEE AND 4 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE REVATI MOHITE DERE, CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE W. DIENGDOH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2026-01-29. BRANCH MANAGER, HDFC BANK LTD. v. SIMA BHATTACHARJEE AND 4 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
Serial No. 01 HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA Daily List AT SHILLONG WA No. 80/2025 with MC (WA) No. 100/2025 Date of Order: 29. 01. 2026 Branch Manager, HDFC Bank Ltd. , Police Bazar Branch, Police Bazar, Shillong-793001, Meghalaya ..... Appellant Vs. 1. Mrs. Sima Bhattacharjee 2. The State of Meghalaya, represented by the Commissioner and Secretary, Home Police Department, Govt. of Meghalaya. 3. The Meghalaya Cyber Crime Branch, Shillong, represented by Deputy Superintendent, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 4. The Officer-in-Charge, Rynjah Police Station, Rynjah, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. th 5. National Payment Corporation of India, 1001A, B Wing, 10 Floor, The Capital, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400050 ..... Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Appearance: For the Appellant : Mr. S. Marpan, Adv For the Respondents : Mr. K. Paul, Sr. Adv with Mr. S.
Chanda, Adv for R/1 Mr. N. Syngkon, GA with Mr. J. N. Rynjah, GA for R/2-4 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble, the Chief Justice) (Oral) Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1. th 2. By this appeal, the appellant has impugned the order dated 10 December, 2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 319 of 2024. 3. Admittedly, the said petition is pending and the order impugned is an interim order by which the appellant has been directed to remit an amount of ₹99,000/- within seven days from the date of the order into the account of the respondent No. 1 (original petitioner). 4. Without going into the merits of the impugned order, learned counsel for the appellant states that he will remit the said amount into th the respondent No. 1’s account before 15 February, 2026, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the learned Single Judge in the pending writ petition. 5.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 also states that the said amount will be accepted without prejudice to his rights and contentions in the writ petition pending before the learned Single Judge. He states that the amount of ₹99,000/- will not be utilised till the aforesaid writ petition is disposed of. 6. With the aforesaid order, the appeal and the miscellaneous application stand disposed of. 7. We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the impugned order and, as such, all contentions of the parties are kept open. (W. Diengdoh) (Revati Mohite Dere) Judge Chief Justice Meghalaya 29. 01. 2026 “Lam DR-PS” Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by LAMPHRANG KHARCHANDY Date: 2026. 01. 29 15:15:02 IST
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.