Smt Rathod Munnamma v. Sri Shashanka IAS
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.LAKSHMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-13. Smt Rathod Munnamma v. Sri Shashanka IAS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3168 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1865 OF 2024 '10 Contempt Case under Sections to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent herein for deliberate, violation and willful disobedience of the order dated 02. 05. 2024 made in W. P No. 12494 of 2024. Between: Smt Rathod Munnamma, Wo Late Rathod Shankar, Aqed about 60 vears. Occ: R/o H. No. 6-22, Kondakal Village, Shaikerpally lgriculturist, Manbal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana 501203. ... PETITlONERS AND Sri Shashanka lAS, The District Collector, Kongarkalan, Ranga Reddy District ... RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. NALLAMASU KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LI\KSHMAN CONTEMPT CASE No. 1866 of 2o.
24 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed alleging willful and deliberate violation of order, dated 02. O5. 2024 in W. P. No. l2494 of 2024. Vide the aforesaid order, this Court disposed of the writ petition directing respondent No. 3 to consider the ontne application, dated O1 . O2. 2O24 submitted b1, the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordalce with law within a period of eight (B) weeks from the date: of receipt of the said order. 2. Petitioner filed the present Contempt Case alleging willful and deliberate violation of the said order. 1 I \ g. / Ms. . Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has produced written instructions of respondent along with copy of the order, dated ra- 12. 12. 2024 stating tJlat t-l:e request made by the applicant to consider her online application rvas not C. C. No. 1866 of recofiunended as multiple encumbrances are took place over the subject land.
The copy of the said order is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner. He seeks liberty to challenge the said order. The said written instructions and the said order, dated 12. l2-2O24 of the respondent are placed on record. 4. Recording the said submission, this Contempt Case 'is closed. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings, dated 12. 12. 2024. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed. - Sd/. K. SAILESHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR /ffRUE COPY// E ION OFFICER To Adv-ocate tgPUCl- 1. One CC to SRl. NALLAMASU KRISHNA' - Hish court for the state of relangana i. i;; d6. io ci ron neVerlur, touTl 3 Two CD CoPies P ar HIGH COURT / DATED:13 t12t2024 1 nF 1 t{E :i14 r4r s ( c z ORDER 2 / Jiil 2025 :" CC. No. 1866 -1}.. ' of 2OZ4 ,:, -\,(r. \-,"// . ,... CC IS CLOSED il,/- )\ @
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.