DR V L MADHUSUDHAN v. M/S SWASTHYA HEALTH VENTURES
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-12-12. DR V L MADHUSUDHAN v. M/S SWASTHYA HEALTH VENTURES. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - CMP No. 105 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 105 OF 2022 BETWEEN: DR V L MADHUSUDHAN S/O L VEDAMURTHY PARTNER SWASTHYA HEALTH VENTURES AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO 301,5TH MAIN, BEML LAYOUT BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560079 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K. , ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S SWASTHYA HEALTH VENTURES A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER THE PARTNERSHIP ACT NO 309, SUBBALAKSHMI COMPLEX PRASANNA ANJANEYA SEVA TRUST NELAMANAGAL KUNIGAL CIRCLE BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT REP. BY ITS PARTNER Digitally signed SRI DINESH K. by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH 2.
MR DINESH K COURT OF S/O KRISHNAPPA KARNATAKA PARTNER SWASTHYA HEALTH VENTURES AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT NO 58/158 ANANDANAGAR T BEGUR POST NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT- 562123 ALSO AT MR DINESH K S/O KRISHNAPPA R/A NO 45, AARADHANA 5TH CROSS H VEERAIAH ENCLAVE ADARSHANAGAR - 2 - CMP No. 105 of 2022 ARISINAKUNTE - 562123 NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS THIS CIVIL MISC. PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 011(5) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING TO A) APPOINT AN ARBITRATOR AND REFER THE DISPUTES BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENTS TO ARBITRATION AS PER THE CLAUSE 15 OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT DATED: 04. 02. 2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a.
Appoint an arbitrator and refer the disputes between the petitioner and the respondents to Arbitration as per the clause 15 of the Arbitration Agreement dated: 04. 02. 2020 vide Annexure-A. b. Direct the respondents to pay the cost of the petition. c. Grant such other relief as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant. 2. None appears for the petitioner. 3. Despite the order dated 28. 11. 2025, neither the process fee has been paid nor is there any appearance on the part of the petitioner. - 3 - CMP No. 105 of 2022 4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR List No. : 1 Sl No. : 91
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.