WANGKHEIMAYUM UMAKANTA SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2020-09-02. WANGKHEIMAYUM UMAKANTA SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Item No. 1 (Through video conferencing) IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 476 of 2020 Wangkheimayum Umakanta Singh, aged about 31 years, S/O W. Ibomcha Singh of Wangkhei Khunou, Near Indian Army War Cemetry, P. O. Imphal & P. S. Porompat, District-Imphal East, Manipur-Pin : 795001 at present posting at GC, CRPF, Imhal, having HC/Min No. 131020057. …. Petitioner/s - Versus – Union of India represented through its Home Secretary (Ministry of Home Affairs) North Block, New Delhi, Government of India. -110001 & 4Ors. .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 02. 09. 2020 Heard Mr. M. Devananda, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. S. Vijayanand Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. [2] In the present case, the petitioner is challenging the order dated th 29. 07. 2020 transferring him from Group Centre (GC), Imphal to 87 Bn and also the office order dated 27. 08.
2020 relieving him from his posting of Group Centre (GC) w. e. f 29. 08. 2020. [3] Mr. M. Devananda submitted that being aggrieved by the aforesaid impugned order, the petitioner had submitted a representation to the Inspector General of Police, M&N Sector, CRPF, Imphal, Manipur highlighting his grievances and requesting to consider his request for allowing th th him to be posted to 86 Bn in place of 87 Bn. WP(C) NO. 476 of 2020 Page 1 [4] Mr. M. Devananda submitted that the said representation has not yet been considered by the authorities and he submitted that the present writ petition can be disposed of by directing the respondent No. 3 to consider and dispose of the said representation submitted by the petitioner by issuing a speaking order within a stipulated period. [5] After hearing both the counsel, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent No. 3 to consider and dispose of the said representation dated 03. 08.
2020 submitted by the petitioner by issuing a speaking order within a period of 15(fifteen) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to submit a copy of the said representation along with a copy of this order to the IGP, M&N Sector, CRPF, Imphal within a period of 1(one) week from today. [6] Pending consideration and disposal of the said representation, the petitioner should be allowed to remain at his present place of posting, if not already join his new place of posting. Copy of this order by furnished to both the counsel of the parties through their respective e-mail. JUDGE Lhaineichong MAYANGL Digitally signed by MAYANGLAMBAM AMBAM CHANU NANDINI CHANU Date: 2020. 09. 02 14:26:17 +05'30' NANDINI WP(C) NO. 476 of 2020 Page 2
Source: High Court of Manipur. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.