Skip to main content
LawSphereX

THE DIVISIONAL v. AMBIKA AND ORS

Court: High Court of Karnataka

Bench: LALITHA KANNEGANTI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2024-01-02. THE DIVISIONAL v. AMBIKA AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH ND DATED THIS THE 02 DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No. 200450 OF 2018 (MV I) BETWEEN THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLER, NEKRTC, M. S. K. MIL ROAD, KALABURAGI. ... APPELLANT (BY SMT. RATNA N. SHIVAYOGIMATH, ADVOCATE) AND 1. AMBIKA D/O SIDRAMAPPA (W/O ASHWIN BALE), AGE: 23 YEARS R/O. SHIVAJI NAGAR KALABURAGI-585102. 2. SHAIKHHANIF S/O MAHEBOOB AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUISNESS (OWNER OF TIPPER), R/O H. NO. 8/1796/2, FILTER BED ROAD, TAJ NAGAR TQ: & DIST: KALABURAGI-585103. 3. SHRIRAM GENERAL INS. CO. LTD, E-8M, EPIP, RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA, SITAPUR JAIPUR RAJASTHAN-303022. 4. BEERAPPA S/O BASAPPA ELOOR, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: NEKRTC BUS DRIVER VIDE BUS NO. KA 38/F775 MFA No. 200450/2018 R/O GUNAL S-S-VILLAGE, TQ: MUDDEBIHAL, DIST: VIJAYAPUR - 586212. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUBHASH MALLAPUR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3 (VK FILED) R4 SERVED) MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL FILED U/S.

173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, BY THE ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT IT IS PRAYS THAT, THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND SET THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 14. 09. 2017 PASSED BY THE I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND M. A. C. T. AT KALABURAGI IN MVC NO. 941/2015 BY REJECTING THE CLAIM OF THE RESPONDENT AGAINST THE CORPORATION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned counsel for the appellant shall take out substituted service of notice to Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 by filing proper application by 12. 01. 2023, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE MFA No. 200450/2018 NOTE: Vide order dated 02. 01. 2024. the learned counsel for the appellant has not taken out substituted service of notice to respondents nos. 1 and 2 by filing proper application by 12. 01. 2023. Hence, the appeal shall dismissed without reference to the Court.

Sd/- AASSSSIISSTTAANNTT R REEGGIISSTTRRAARR T By : RBM R By : SH C By : AK

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.