Skip to main content
LawSphereX

MR. V. RANGANATH v. MR. H. SANJEEV REDDY

Court: High Court of Karnataka

Bench: H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-21. MR. V. RANGANATH v. MR. H. SANJEEV REDDY. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

- 1 - WP No. 10056 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ST DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10056 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MR. V. RANGANATH S/O LATE MR. VENKATESH. AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, NO. 57, BANASAWADI MAIN ROAD, NEAR BANASAWADI BUS-STAND, BANGALORE-560043 OPP MUTTU'S FINANCE, DODDA BANASAWADI, ALSO AT NO. C001, GROUND FLOOR, C-BLOCK, LIVING WALLS' APARTMENT, PEDDANNA REDDY LAYOUT, HORAMAVU MAIN ROAD, Digitally signed by BANGALORE - 560 043 DHANALAKSHMI &PETITIONER MURTHY Location: HIGH (BY SRI. MALLESAPPA L. , ADVOCATE) COURTOF KARNATAKA AND: 1. MR. H. SANJEEV REDDY S/O LATE MR. HANUMAANTHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, 2. MR. S. ASHOK S/O MR. H. SANJEEV REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, - 2 - WP No. 10056 of 2026 BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO. 22, VIJAYA BANK COLONY, R. M. NAGAR MAIN ROAD, DODDA BANASAWADI, BANGALORE - 560 043 &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JANARDHANA G. , ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 AND R2 IN C. P. NO.

6566/2026) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO(I) ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE V ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXIV ACJM, MAYO HALL, BANGALORE, (SCCH-20), 07/03/2026, REJECTING THE APPLICATIONS FILED BY THE PETITIONER, UNDER SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR REOPENING OF THE CASE AND UNDER ORDER XVIII RULE 17 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE And etc. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the suit itself has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, the writ petition will not survive for consideration as the same has now become infructuous. 2. Memo dated: 21. 04. 2026 is taken on record. - 3 - WP No. 10056 of 2026 3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE PSJ List No. : 1 Sl No. : 17

Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.