AJAY MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: ARUN MONGA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-02-10. AJAY MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2025:RJ-JD:8141] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 726/2022 Vijay Meena S/o Heera Lal Meena, Aged About 21 Years, B/c Meena, R/o Village Akela Talab Bambora Postt Bambora Tehsil Girwa, District Udaipur (Raj. ). 313706 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Home Department Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police- Cum- Member Secretary Of Selection Board Of Constable Recruitment, Udaipur. 4. Police Commissioner- Cum- Chairman Selection Board For Constable Recruitment, Jodhpur. ----Respondents Connected With S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 637/2022 Ajay Meena S/o Heera Lal Meena, Aged About 19 Years, By Caste Meena, R/o Village Akela Talab Bambora Post Bambora, Tehsil Girwa, District Udaipur (Raj. ) 313706 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Home Department, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Jaipur. 3.
Superintendent Of Police Cum Member Secretary Of Selection Board Of Constable Recruitment, Udaipur. 4. Police Comissioner Cum Chairman Selection Board For Constable Recruitment, Jodhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Soni for Mr. B. L. Bhati, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA [2025:RJ-JD:8141] (2 of 2) [CW-726/2022] Order (Oral) 10/02/2025 1. The petitions were filed sometime in 2022, inter-alia, seeking appointment on the post of Constable pursuant to the advertisement dated 04. 12. 2019 (Annex. 1). 2. When called out for hearing, none appears for the petitioners. It appears that by sheer passage of time, the nature of relief sought by the petitioners is rendered stale and meaningless and/or they otherwise seem to have acquiesced to their fait accompli and moved on in life for greener pastures. That is why perhaps, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 3.
Dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate application, if any cause survives. 4. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ARUN MONGA),J 128 & 129-Rmathur/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.